Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v13Dl7Ws020838 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:47:08 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cZe9w-0004HU-JB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:44:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cZe9w-0004HL-AC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:44:16 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cZe9t-0005x9-Ri for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:44:15 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC0B520BC3 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:44:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3vFJ4W2Bmcz106V for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:44:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5894892B.7010807@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:44:11 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <159c6d4aa99-2cc9-11356@webprd-m36.mail.aol.com> <5884E0D8.1090102@abelian.org> <5885FBEE.3060408@posteo.de> <58861BDF.8010605@posteo.de> <58875792.7020302@posteo.de> <58879804.7010301@abelian.org> <5887ACEB.2000207@posteo.de> <5888EEDA.6070308@abelian.org> <588DE1EE.3050408@posteo.de> <588E25B1.8010009@abelian.org> <0af401d27d92$a83d69e0$f8b83da0$@comcast.net> <0b7201d27e1c$3df842f0$b9e8c8d0$@comcast.net> <58948447.8030503@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <58948447.8030503@posteo.de> X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: Re: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070402000306060206060204" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10466 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070402000306060206060204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ...another thought: It appears to be completely crazy but when looking at these curves i'm asking myselfe if we could get a peak on Wolf's RX on *970 Hz*!?? So far i can generate just 5 kV on that antenna on that frequency, an ERP of 3 nW. But i can run it for weeks, even during rain. Could someone calculate/estimate the time i need to transmit for producing a significant peak on Wolf's RX? 73, Stefan --------------070402000306060206060204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ...another thought: It appears to be completely crazy but when looking at these curves i'm asking myselfe if we could get a peak on Wolf's RX on 970 Hz!??

So far i can generate just 5 kV on that antenna on that frequency, an ERP of 3 nW. But i can run it for weeks, even during rain. Could someone calculate/estimate the time i need to transmit for producing a significant peak on Wolf's RX?

73, Stefan
--------------070402000306060206060204--