Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v1BMirUD020196 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:44:54 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ccgLk-0005F0-2Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:41:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ccgLj-0005Er-FC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:40:59 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-6.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.70]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ccgLf-00038s-MZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:40:58 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([78.150.99.89]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id cgLecjTo3gKstcgLecJAUq; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:40:54 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [78.150.99.89] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=GdBVpkfL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=baxIhyPjABw5dzY0/My51w==:117 a=baxIhyPjABw5dzY0/My51w==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=OKM_ncf9NfwRzFXbhLYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=wygtsRLyp0gA:10 a=wQf5WvvPLwzY6UdiLRIz:22 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15a2edffc07-2570-11f0@webprd-m99.mail.aol.com> <861ff997-0c30-5943-1954-3e87afc0284d@abelian.org> From: g3zjo Message-ID: <0706ad8c-a9a8-f81d-05b4-79777ca98df7@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:40:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <861ff997-0c30-5943-1954-3e87afc0284d@abelian.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 170211-0, 11/02/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIyw4R54BBuhl81aaK/qRcFKaQQaBx6jpBHQ/s85TE1YUCoQAbsbzZtUfLcjL5OwiNK9xEpUTzNLoZEqMkD4IRNVeGaIGwEfVbhjp5nu8TqpNDuFZbJs UV2jHHz8zIh0sOn9pbfezP5XkZVqFHE5WHPWJ05qxZjoZeI+165GvR+TgX4bZYniI1+apqZoNGv7Tg== X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: Re: VLF: Weekend carrier on 8270.005 Hz... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10563 Its my turn now. Is it a line that I see on 8270.005, a healthy peak often 2-3dB above the noise. Two separate 47uHz instances in two different colour palettes, Sub9KHz Test 3 and Test 4 on my Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm If so its the first time I have received Stefan's fixed station I believe. I am awaiting some other longer period instances to initialise soon, the noise has dropped substantially, I hope the signal continues OK overnight. 73 Eddie G3ZJO