To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <159c3496198-4603-10618@webprd-m81.mail.aol.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Wolfgang_B=c3=bcscher?= <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
Message-ID: <77624999-64e7-3c45-c1ba-a7d4db32fbf2@freenet.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:51:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <159c3496198-4603-10618@webprd-m81.mail.aol.com>
Subject: Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------EC44819EBB090726202D7A3F"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------EC44819EBB090726202D7A3F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello VLFers and all,

That's indeed a nice surprise, considering the low bitrate of the 
Vorbis-compressed audio stream that 'transported' Stefan's signal from 
here (Spenge-Bardüttingdort, near Bielefeld) to Paul's amazing decoder. 
The amount of worldwide statics observable on the fast-running 
spectrogram is huge. I guess without the lossy digital stuff in between, 
Stefan's signal may have crossed the four-lambda barrier.

Have a nice sunday everyone,
    Wolf
(currently on another building site, but still watching here)


Am 22.01.2017 um 00:08 schrieb Markus Vester:
> Hi Paul,
>
> yes, Stefan's carrier was on 2970.000 again today (Jan 21st, 8-17 UT): 
> http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html
>
> Catching the ULF signal in Bielefeld is a fantastic result for the 
> three of you, Stefan, Wolf and yourself! Wonder how that will compare 
> to the Strassbourg data. Compliments on the spherics blanking 
> optimisation work!
>
> Best 73,
> Markus (DF6NM)
>
> PS: At this moment the beep stopped as my carrier went off for the 
> night. I've set it up to come back tomorrow (Sunday) at 7 UT, and a 
> repeat of today's 8270.1 Hz EbNaut sequence should start at 10 UT.
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
> Von: Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abelian.org>
> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Verschickt: Sa, 21. Jan 2017 23:23
> Betreff: Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th
>
>
> Stefan wrote:
>
> > my frequency is 2970.000 Hz, not 2970.005 Hz as announced...
>
> Your signal on the 20th detectable at Bielefeld via the
> online receiver of Wolf Buescher DL4YHF, distance 303.75 km!
>
> Just about exactly three wavelengths!
>
> So, you are transmitting Stefan!
>
> S/N is about 10.5dB in but I haven't optimised the blanker and
> filter settings for use on vlf6 at that band, so, it probably
> can be improved.
>
> Is today's (21st) transmission on 2970.0 or 2970.005?
>
> The signal at Bielefeld is still present today but remains on
> 2970.000. It was not present on Friday or Thursday.
>
> --
> Paul Nicholson
> --
>


--------------EC44819EBB090726202D7A3F
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Hello VLFers and all,<br>
    <br>
    That's indeed a nice surprise, considering the low bitrate of the
    Vorbis-compressed audio stream that 'transported' Stefan's signal
    from here (Spenge-Bardüttingdort, near Bielefeld) to Paul's amazing
    decoder. The amount of worldwide statics observable on the
    fast-running spectrogram is huge. I guess without the lossy digital
    stuff in between, Stefan's signal may have crossed the four-lambda
    barrier.<br>
    <br>
    Have a nice sunday everyone,<br>
       Wolf <br>
    (currently on another building site, but still watching here)<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 22.01.2017 um 00:08 schrieb Markus
      Vester:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:159c3496198-4603-10618@webprd-m81.mail.aol.com"
      type="cite">
      <div
style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:black;">
        <div style="color: black; font-family:
          arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Hi Paul,<br>
          <br>
          yes, Stefan's carrier was on 2970.000 again today (Jan 21st,
          8-17 UT):
          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html">http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html</a><br>
          <br>
          Catching the ULF signal in Bielefeld is a fantastic result for
          the three of you, Stefan, Wolf and yourself! Wonder how that
          will compare to the Strassbourg data. Compliments on the
          spherics blanking optimisation work!<br>
          <br>
          Best 73,<br>
          Markus (DF6NM)<br>
          <br>
          PS: At this moment the beep stopped as my carrier went off for
          the night. I've set it up to come back tomorrow (Sunday) at 7
          UT, and a repeat of today's 8270.1 Hz EbNaut sequence should
          start at 10 UT.<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- <br>
          Von: Paul Nicholson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vlf0403@abelian.org">&lt;vlf0403@abelian.org&gt;</a><br>
          An: rsgb_lf_group <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">&lt;rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org&gt;</a><br>
          Verschickt: Sa, 21. Jan 2017 23:23<br>
          Betreff: Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <br>
        Stefan wrote:<br>
        <br>
        &gt; my frequency is 2970.000 Hz, not 2970.005 Hz as
        announced...<br>
        <br>
        Your signal on the 20th detectable at Bielefeld via the<br>
        online receiver of Wolf Buescher DL4YHF, distance 303.75 km!<br>
        <br>
        Just about exactly three wavelengths!<br>
        <br>
        So, you are transmitting Stefan!<br>
        <br>
        S/N is about 10.5dB in but I haven't optimised the blanker and<br>
        filter settings for use on vlf6 at that band, so, it probably<br>
        can be improved.<br>
        <br>
        Is today's (21st) transmission on 2970.0 or 2970.005?<br>
        <br>
        The signal at Bielefeld is still present today but remains on<br>
        2970.000. It was not present on Friday or Thursday.<br>
        <br>
        --<br>
        Paul Nicholson<br>
        --<br>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------EC44819EBB090726202D7A3F--