Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: INFN-TO: mailn 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v0O9LvT6012565 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:21:58 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cVxEe-0007Yv-IX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:17:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cVxEc-0007Ym-UT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:17:50 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cVxEZ-0006Q2-5k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:17:49 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C65820B98 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:17:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3v72dh15jhz105n for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:17:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58871BB7.9090502@posteo.de> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:17:43 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <159cd6620ca-6fdd-1526c@webprd-a74.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <159cd6620ca-6fdd-1526c@webprd-a74.mail.aol.com> X-Scan-Signature: 17343f7e400f1005b5081acbd4115359 Subject: Re: VLF: Three dots Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070503090808020202060901" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10321 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070503090808020202060901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus, I see the dots and probably you are right, it should be your signal. On the other side we see how strong the QRN has been just during that weekend :-/ My postprocessing should be completed in the evening. 3 SL instances are running on that recording, 11 instances are running on that PC, which is close to its limit. Thus i didn't yet start to analyse your signal from the recording but i will start with that in the evening and i'm very optimistic. It is interesting to see how low the background noise can be between the sferics :-) 73, Stefan Am 23.01.2017 23:15, schrieb Markus Vester: > Interestingly, my on 8270.0025 Hz carrier transmissions during the > last three evenings > Jan 20, 18:00 - 23:00 UT, > Jan 21, 15:28 - 23:00 UT, > Jan 22, 13:23 - 23:00 UT > left three dots on Stefan's 47 uHz spectrogram > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html . > > This is astonishing because the tree-receiver is currently connected > to a north-south oriented loop, whereas I am due east in a null. So I > was wondering whether reception was made possible by skywave with > rotated polarisation? Perhaps reminiscent of the playful > colour changes on Stefan's MF colour-DF grabber. > > Despite much lower noise background, the (shorter) daytime carrier > Jan 22, 07:00 - 10:00 UT. > left no trace at all. > > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > --------------070503090808020202060901 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus,

I see the dots and probably you are right, it should be your signal. On the other side we see how strong the QRN has been just during that weekend :-/
My postprocessing should be completed in the evening. 3 SL instances are running on that recording, 11 instances are running on that PC, which is close to its limit. Thus i didn't yet start to analyse your signal from the recording but i will start with that in the evening and i'm very optimistic. It is interesting to see how low the background noise can be between the sferics :-)

73, Stefan

Am 23.01.2017 23:15, schrieb Markus Vester:
Interestingly, my on 8270.0025 Hz carrier transmissions during the last three evenings
 Jan 20, 18:00 - 23:00 UT,
 Jan 21, 15:28 - 23:00 UT,
 Jan 22, 13:23 - 23:00 UT
left three dots on Stefan's 47 uHz spectrogram http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html .

This is astonishing because the tree-receiver is currently connected to a north-south oriented loop, whereas I am due east in a null. So I was wondering whether reception was made possible by skywave with rotated polarisation? Perhaps reminiscent of the playful colour changes on Stefan's MF colour-DF grabber.

Despite much lower noise background, the (shorter) daytime carrier
 Jan 22, 07:00 - 10:00 UT.
left no trace at all.

Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)

--------------070503090808020202060901--