Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 18:08:03 -0500
From: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Message-Id: <159c3496198-4603-10618@webprd-m81.mail.aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <5883DED3.4040004@abelian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_82811_84270619.1485040083350"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

------=_Part_82811_84270619.1485040083350
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Paul,

yes, Stefan's carrier was on 2970.000 again today (Jan 21st, 8-17 UT): http=
://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html

Catching the ULF signal in Bielefeld is a fantastic result for the three of=
 you, Stefan, Wolf and yourself! Wonder how that will compare to the Strass=
bourg data. Compliments on the spherics blanking optimisation work!

Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)

PS: At this moment the beep stopped as my carrier went off for the night. I=
've set it up to come back tomorrow (Sunday) at 7 UT, and a repeat of today=
's 8270.1 Hz EbNaut sequence should start at 10 UT.


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20
Von: Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abelian.org>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 21. Jan 2017 23:23
Betreff: Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th


Stefan wrote:

 > my frequency is 2970.000 Hz, not 2970.005 Hz as announced...

Your signal on the 20th detectable at Bielefeld via the
online receiver of Wolf Buescher DL4YHF, distance 303.75 km!

Just about exactly three wavelengths!

So, you are transmitting Stefan!

S/N is about 10.5dB in but I haven't optimised the blanker and
filter settings for use on vlf6 at that band, so, it probably
can be improved.

Is today's (21st) transmission on 2970.0 or 2970.005?

The signal at Bielefeld is still present today but remains on
2970.000. It was not present on Friday or Thursday.

--
Paul Nicholson
--
------=_Part_82811_84270619.1485040083350
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div style=3D"font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:b=
lack;"><div style=3D"color: black; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;=
 font-size: 10pt;">Hi Paul,<br><br>yes, Stefan's carrier&nbsp;was on 2970.0=
00 again today (Jan 21st, 8-17 UT): http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaef=
er_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html<br><br>Catching the&nbsp;ULF signal in Biele=
feld is a fantastic result for the three of you, Stefan, Wolf and yourself!=
&nbsp;Wonder how that will compare to the Strassbourg data. Compliments on =
the spherics blanking optimisation work!<br><br>Best 73,<br>Markus (DF6NM)<=
br><br>PS: At this moment the beep stopped as my carrier&nbsp;went off for =
the night. I've set it up to come back tomorrow (Sunday) at 7 UT,&nbsp;and =
a repeat of today's&nbsp;8270.1 Hz EbNaut sequence should start at 10 UT.<b=
r><br><br>-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- <br>Von: Paul Nicholson &=
lt;vlf0403@abelian.org&gt;<br>An: rsgb_lf_group &lt;rsgb_lf_group@blackshee=
p.org&gt;<br>Verschickt: Sa, 21. Jan 2017 23:23<br>Betreff: Re: LF: VLF/ULF=
 activity weekend 21th/22th<br><br></div><br>Stefan wrote:<br><br> &gt; my =
frequency is 2970.000 Hz, not 2970.005 Hz as announced...<br><br>Your signa=
l on the 20th detectable at Bielefeld via the<br>online receiver of Wolf Bu=
escher DL4YHF, distance 303.75 km!<br><br>Just about exactly three waveleng=
ths!<br><br>So, you are transmitting Stefan!<br><br>S/N is about 10.5dB in =
but I haven't optimised the blanker and<br>filter settings for use on vlf6 =
at that band, so, it probably<br>can be improved.<br><br>Is today's (21st) =
transmission on 2970.0 or 2970.005?<br><br>The signal at Bielefeld is still=
 present today but remains on<br>2970.000.    It was not present on Friday =
or Thursday.<br><br>--<br>Paul Nicholson<br>--<br><br></div>
------=_Part_82811_84270619.1485040083350--