Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uBUKPVR0006702 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:25:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cN3g6-0003YX-E3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:21:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cN3g6-0003YO-0n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:21:26 +0000 Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cN3g3-0007Hn-2o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:21:24 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p42so378421983ioo.1 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:21:22 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ADhXRrRTProbkAJu9903czdpYJo5IilqVEHT6BDjJgs=; b=Yia9+iLwW4+VsCvuLa0ldggd8LRJoU+/31A+TThmmV+6c+nIx1+eJH5SWjXyjzaKrd j5lgFNvfZ7DqyzVfzDZQzsoecqsAtAtGS5edUK3NfKIlOZhhRd1L/dxSoNEkVRcmtqFs ORfL9KLAJ1WOLMnTAg2dfdnMYjgU8vghcLbfIfzl4AMOIr7hksNHeEThU+a15mDhb9vT nqdJR6Ah+H8Xr1DMxjU8pzg8rc1YTkeE8KXIpF6O+hajV4ZiROP3dNagj/hd1PsVtIS/ YpLzMcv9f0uEYW9Km7vciIT537I55sLUbjuknnBRIMRYbZUrH+Gue+odOdObzpcvpdXD L/wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ADhXRrRTProbkAJu9903czdpYJo5IilqVEHT6BDjJgs=; b=lds2bViz7jtYQOZCDCS8m413R69xRFZ95XrNWgTM2hrxfWcV9FHNAZ6YbjcF6mtBK6 Q5YrYn4Vhlrs3Imj9aXWk5/IkU6djVpQU73eMp3XKp/RLURiScI5XK+haEM4al3lIAqt kC292Iyu7I1GgdkTN3qlWSJ8xbIPDMz+o/2PbyrbTXfreoe9U/OLxBzeh1f5eFHlgMcj lxWNP1JSQsBPtHYh9MKwq1nbvZrL2aubEOTdmxQsK45SlJ3x+byj4A/vn2H0pgsZAkU6 OkeXbSvvnW6S4xyoHvj8mhY+4ISE2hNc4L4wdqIYiggaPXvJsfeI1BT4ZS9uVkj/hyIJ KSUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLm2r00GvEBimZohkHo9SFs8b7XVMxzeep1KqPwoTz9zO/GKWH/0f2cBeocCB+XxxoxqRaPPjtpQcAWxQ== X-Received: by 10.107.129.12 with SMTP id c12mr1421627iod.160.1483129280568; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:21:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.26.13 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:21:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <687739E070EE477CBA9B842829561367@gnat> References: <687739E070EE477CBA9B842829561367@gnat> From: pete march Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:21:20 +0000 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: cd16d8c2fb75309db133b7de4adb1391 Subject: Re: LF: bouncing posts Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f64e6eca4ac0544e5f192 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10017 --001a113f64e6eca4ac0544e5f192 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all Well so far so good. I have changed my E-Mail address and I can now seem to write to Blacksheep...... trouble is I can't think of anything to say..... [:-( Petefmt On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Alan Melia wrote: > Hi all several members have been complaining about their inability to post > messages to blacksheep. With the assistance of Chris 2E0ILY and his > cooperative hosting site technical help desk, we have confirmed that his > "lock-out" is due to exceeding the spam score on a message and being > flagged as a spammer. It would seem that this state does not expire nor are > subsequent messages even tested. You are still able to receive the > distribution but not post. > > As far as I can see this state can only be manually reset by the > (non-existant) admin. The only solution seems to be to re-subscribe with a > different email address. This does mean you will get two copies of the > distribution because being flagged you may not get an unsubscribe message > to the system either. > > The spam scoring utility uses statistics to assess the probability a > message is spam, see... > https://www.lifewire.com/bayesian-spam-filtering-1164096 > the result is it is likely to make mistakes occasionally. The system uses > path, domain, route (Laurence KL7K could not get in from China) and message > content to derive a score.....so beware a jokey comment might get you > banned :-)) > > I am sorry we cannot help further on this problem. > > Alan > G3NYK > > > --001a113f64e6eca4ac0544e5f192 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all

Well so far so good. = I have changed my E-Mail address and I can now seem to write to Blacksheep.= ..... trouble is I can't think of anything to say..... [:-(
<= br>
Petefmt

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Alan Melia <alan= .melia@btinternet.com> wrote:
Hi all several members have been complaining about their inability to po= st messages to blacksheep. With the assistance of Chris 2E0ILY and his coop= erative hosting site technical help desk, we have confirmed that his "= lock-out" is due to exceeding the spam score on a message and being fl= agged as a spammer. It would seem that this state does not expire nor are s= ubsequent messages even tested. You are still able to receive the distribut= ion but not post.

As far as I can see this state can only be manually reset by the (non-exist= ant) admin. The only solution seems to be to re-subscribe with a different = email address. This does mean you will get two copies of the distribution b= ecause being flagged you may not get an unsubscribe message to the system e= ither.

The spam scoring utility uses statistics to assess the probability a messag= e is spam, see...
https://www.lifewire.com/bayesian-spam-= filtering-1164096
the result is it is likely to make mistakes occasionally. The system uses p= ath, domain, route (Laurence KL7K could not get in from China) and message = content to derive a score.....so beware a jokey comment might get you banne= d :-))

I am sorry we cannot help further on this problem.

Alan
G3NYK



--001a113f64e6eca4ac0544e5f192--