Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uBLGc7F8029987 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:38:09 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cJjqf-0006l3-BM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:34:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cJjqZ-0006ku-BE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:34:31 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cJjqW-0007Hi-Mp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:34:30 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id a197so153032122wmd.0 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:34:28 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/aKo0dIOZiUnYVDJu6bn7k02ppfriBlmoga3oGHdGYA=; b=TGchpnCjJh9Q13Ky2XlIxnBRGblNSooDZAyaKJu9wbeFfq4Q/JNt0Lv15O6lTQnLf6 55YAJvO8SWhqLugLY6O+LqkanF8dm4ilheesLS1jduErWzxBcsbJMxnS9r9Ohe15UUBX Mk+VdfHiTaZ0Lo3knrjvjJ9Lrqh2PYgPN1ClA0lvuEbYuW5tuxjheltdWUtigikvwcdj Mxiinefxu43mxJ2dISPMmOzIlY373PZ36JiE9byZ7NaqEbykbkFZYb/BiUDVxiibsQ6x xBSq3XeU2lnbckHWYNVA8Nk4yg9415eVJuEjBjKWAtbtyUsp7OaX18ZYh+eMao3oDmPA is7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=/aKo0dIOZiUnYVDJu6bn7k02ppfriBlmoga3oGHdGYA=; b=NlQ5hy2mn9YVkT9veMCtVfZucD3sgAyg/Pb7cZUof4rRyeYic9A+p6kzGr0FARirRn lnhW++8djpgUNnYfFz/TVmh++x/0bY6th8xFiMtTPBpzigPqOYp7guFolvvMwXlAq/NC 7pHBFdWs7tLtdg1ZNSPWayCBAaWNPcVKJPRQv0+AX6hhJp/SQXnb+GaKO57fwZAUm3ne eZEvjO71t7aRO1u3qroPnVv7lnBaaPcce94+date7F6x1eutLIT5NzovsqEZ2ASSzh5F 9en08rmRXLoq0EjyNl1/kwZUOEccXXLJqDZM+ni8kd5m8p1GrcrK9tJN+MKW/onZ1q4C 0pUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJwWmB8FQjm0xnPykpBoOFqCKk4cYH+neYRXgVbuENwwvsK/It8qhm3ljxUieHY4bXoL+1QPryqdSNsfw== X-Received: by 10.28.57.197 with SMTP id g188mr7438850wma.26.1482338065878; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:34:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.182.198 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:34:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1097D2C4-95FD-4FE2-A47C-32F2EE261EAB@gmail.com> References: <158ddfd1f0b-5980-42e@webprd-a47.mail.aol.com> <584AC31C.20803@posteo.de> <584EAB0D.4060004@posteo.de> <58555BA2.7050709@posteo.de> <1482320831911.81165@kuleuven.be> <5e649652-3dd6-e453-0b61-fd50939484cf@mollies.freeserve.co.uk> <1097D2C4-95FD-4FE2-A47C-32F2EE261EAB@gmail.com> From: Warren Ziegler Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:34:25 -0500 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group X-Scan-Signature: 69d86b33142413363dd56bd312139bf4 Subject: LF: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_LF=3A_Re=3A_LF=3A_Re=3A_LF=3A_ULF_experiment=3A_A_MEchanical?= =?UTF-8?Q?_Based_Antenna=E2=80=8B?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9886 Hi John, I went to the M.I.T. library and made copies of Alexanderson's original papers and did some other research beyond that. The Alexanderson alternators were good up to about 20kHz, they achieved higher frequencies by feeding the output of the alternator into a saturated reactor which generated harmonics, they then filtered out the harmonic that they wanted and fed it to the antenna. Not sure but the antennas were of such high Q that additional filtering might not have been necessary. They would indeed fly apart if they tried to generate a 100kHz fundamental directly from the alternator! About 15 years ago, I led a group trying to make high-speed energy storage flywheels, they rotated about 45,000 rpm. Initial attempts to use mechanical bearings mounted in a springy steel housing were a failure, magnetic bearings (with a dsp based controller) were absolutely necessary to get through the various mechanical resonances. I made a trip to see British Nuclear Fuels in the U.K., they did make a technically successful high speed energy storage flywheel, but it flopped commercially since it was too expensive to make for the intended markets. A group of Aero engineers at M.I.T. tried to make microturbines with dime sized rotors etched out of silicon or silicon carbide, they hope was to have a small power generation source that would operate from a gaseous fuel and replace batteries. The M.I.T. turbines would spin at over 100,000 rpm and generate A.C. (R.F.) at 3 to 4 MHz! I met with Alan Epstein and his group at M.I.T. back in the early 2000's he detailed some of the problems they were having. I believe the project was ultimately abandoned. 73 Warren On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:41 AM, John Rabson wrote: > Alexanderson generators were built for frequencies up to 100 kHz and did not display a tendency to fly apart. For background information on the 17.2 kHz installation see CREGJ 96. > > John F5VLF > >> On 21 Dec 2016, at 13:54, Martin Evans wrote: >> >> >> Ah yes- of course Andy. >> >> Better stand well back when I try it then! >> >> Martin GW3UCJ. >> >> >> >> >>> 8000 * 60 = 480000 RPM >>> >>> 'jnt >>> >>> >>> On 21 December 2016 at 12:42, Martin Evans wrote: >>> >>> Forgive me for asking what may be quite obvious to many - but does this mean that if I spun a magnet at 8000rpm then I would generate a 8kHz radio signal, identical in every way to an 8kHz signal generated in a more conventional manner? >>> >>> If so, it sounds a lot easier than winding all that wire.....until the magnet flew apart anyway! >>> >>> Martin GW3UCJ Swansea. >>> >>>> >>>> ever heard of a "A MEchanical Based Antenna" ? >>>> >>>> Me neither until today ;-) >>>> >>>> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > john.rabson07@gmail.com > > Researching history of RABSON, BLACKSHAW, GAUNTLETT, VERLANDER and ROBSONNE > > > > > -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1