Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uBQLMkxr021564 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 22:22:47 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cLceR-0003gx-9m for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:17:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cLceQ-0003go-M4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:17:46 +0000 Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cLceN-0005eW-3A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:17:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d45so93074140qta.1 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 13:17:41 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=duIae9wyA4C1U7Yyjjp2lTBLhxonlPcWR4ndwp3cM9E=; b=DaPyFpjhWkeGhTI5MJApi6NDRAFjFISy445azL6EURVI0t2W9MzNdgaCfeFXTJ4OwQ pB63oxUY6s8/Gm5QTGFP2QQA4wUaNseoW8YiYCl/kBMcAIWi4u1clSMmLEkdoNFiO8ZC skI9/kNPVhsdYC3FSqNMePWBlJKGv80C7uQwZ8HEgwCqY7K6bY6jbetWV5IRh+z7/Hkt HcyK6ApVO6SHENqOvxThI7NrQyrF+oZaLVBNTexBW0xnLqyS3OoSfxFIAeibSV2UFIBF 5WHwoRW4MXhQcoeqVr5YNtST5xJ24rUQ9Id+G4OjIjwd/mOvN3FeZqzsuaUixnNhw562 tHzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=duIae9wyA4C1U7Yyjjp2lTBLhxonlPcWR4ndwp3cM9E=; b=efPRq/4yTv/lp8CMJlo8zxU0i6gAQrs/z25PfD+CIU8eMNuNUUx092kNWa4azgSCJg wAfrqZXRwyy5zlekcZ2Fzd94IJj8UOPedNMG6LKAoRmHbYm4ZW3NazBLxk0s3XaA07XM p0dr0vRTX/CRfcCahkYOEyOKTgH59n9xpb+q2pIv+CVxq7fu8bPOjoFaM4hhdhn6AyDZ BdTzNR2pDHh0Md5EOo53uqbfcCtd0Za7eqzkR/5Ms9E/iM2By7yBRf6DGDm6FlNgLbKA ozH4po9aryC1iBb/83lVYh8KlwYiiTdjO/CupPRUIkOsU1FJuMCGSUieE2VNkPAz3CN+ uakw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKIX/e+70KCRanYWlpaAsGde1ONq39+ysQ0Bn+cMOCG4KM+MxzVjHIo2o32QPv5nV7VRwRHspKVdCNxYw== X-Received: by 10.200.51.99 with SMTP id u32mr23423477qta.79.1482787060144; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 13:17:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.34.253 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 13:17:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5860C842.90809@abelian.org> From: Roger Lapthorn Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:17:39 +0000 Message-ID: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Scan-Signature: 34d483c57c7a6bf26c25db3c8765d5fc Subject: Re: LF: Article on forward error correction Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d879aff678a05449643c4 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9965 --001a113d879aff678a05449643c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks Paul. I have added a link on my blog at http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.co.uk . It gets LOTS of visits each day from people all over the world. I have also added a link on my sub-9kHz amateur radio news page. See https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ 73s Roger G3XBM On 26 December 2016 at 19:02, Bill de Carle wrote: > There should be a "Nicholson limit" for how well something of a certain > complexity can be explained using a given number of words with a high > probability of being understood correctly. Your paper is about as good as > it could ever get. Thanks Paul. > Bill VE2IQ > > > At 02:35 AM 12/26/2016, Paul wrote: > > I wrote a non-mathematical introductory article about how >> forward error correction works. >> >> There's a lot of material on the web about FEC but most >> of it is very technical and tends to concentrate on one or >> another particular coding scheme. I couldn't find anything >> that demonstrates and really explains in simple terms the >> essential principle of it. >> >> So I thought I'd try to write something, perhaps to see if >> I can understand it myself. >> >> The article should appeal to anyone who's wondered how 'coding' >> a message, which increases its bandwidth and reduces its S/N, >> can actually lead to greatly improved communications. >> >> http://abelian.org/fec/pn161218/ >> >> or in pdf format >> >> http://abelian.org/fec/pn161218.pdf >> >> Whether I've succeeded or not, the reader will have to judge. >> >> -- >> Paul Nicholson >> -- >> >> > > --001a113d879aff678a05449643c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Paul.

I have added a= link on my blog at
h= ttp://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.co.uk=C2=A0.=C2=A0 It gets LOTS of visits each= day from people all over the world.
=C2=A0
I have also= added a link on my sub-9kHz amateur radio news page. See https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/


On 26 December 2016 at 19:0= 2, Bill de Carle <ve2iq@magma.ca> wrote:
There should be a "Nicholson limit" for how well so= mething of a certain complexity can be explained using a given number of wo= rds with a high probability of being understood correctly.=C2=A0 Your paper= is about as good as it could ever get.=C2=A0 Thanks Paul.
Bill VE2IQ


At 02:35 AM 12/26/2016, Paul wrote:

I wrote a non-mathematical introductory article about how
forward error correction works.

There's a lot of material on the web about FEC but most
of it is very technical and tends to concentrate on one or
another particular coding scheme.=C2=A0 I couldn't find anything
that demonstrates and really explains in simple terms the
essential principle of it.

So I thought I'd try to write something, perhaps to see if
I can understand it myself.

The article should appeal to anyone who's wondered how 'coding'=
a message, which increases its bandwidth and reduces its S/N,
can actually lead to greatly improved communications.

=C2=A0http://abelian.org/fec/pn161218/

or in pdf format

=C2=A0http://abelian.org/fec/pn161218.pdf

Whether I've succeeded or not, the reader will have to judge.

--
Paul Nicholson
--




--001a113d879aff678a05449643c4--