Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uBLCqCvO029151 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:52:13 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cJgIr-0005sk-Bw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:47:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cJgIr-0005sb-2Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:47:29 +0000 Received: from mail-yb0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22d]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cJgIo-0006Ux-AK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:47:27 +0000 Received: by mail-yb0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w19so2857411ybb.2 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:47:25 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1KigUba+ymz0F5sa/2iquojPOtFXEqP0yU2X72wrwA4=; b=Ia2sN3RCBWargS+NeyZei6/UX6Ib2IYzZCgtJYUA0TxnWgbKNFFVVW0gwlDN0c2atE jwWheY6IuMJr+627qVeUsVqaa7CXoKodpqaChAdlC7BPVC4XrJwTSki1JDPOqaM8uq7J UVvWbB/aKvAscnxKZ3MzulTUm1rJMs1N1sXC+TNbb1Ui4L6LrVpnz3aq8s4L0/7/0UEi WH3+LCa14D95igXIwjOed5z6Js3v+T4x740gb/nOWd4/Mpgi3RlQaMUtt9DjkGnmzGDZ HAn5Qf+4AHvqUa879NRFOs/UU91+nbd+urstQtkUkbP+vcOYmW9cdrSiUMeQNTYcofkj 3OuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=1KigUba+ymz0F5sa/2iquojPOtFXEqP0yU2X72wrwA4=; b=VZTZO+H1iXuxWGCPhU+/YEpWRRQP3bpSkqzfh2melxQuvfSbpbB5yrbCNFfuCDhfjM ECZUbMmGjCahqlsB8fXEOPvJjVpNp116P+ij+bjBJ5JHQXNWszko9na8QSrBLhI57eMa OV2a5o28oLFFPnPyht0fymw/w0a2QTuvFqtG5bi2aVwAJB7Q0DFLGcRpmiiZjIAWEMqz jXg4w4/Q7Te4NyGNnc3whznfm6YLdieF5GLrXhiQVa3HluVk0oXkkMQHsdDLbJKvk2HG TEp09s13e4vtU+IEWbQK2WPC+vVcdyIJVsTg8vCDPvKwpzhPEc5ew5vZMxOfOOEXRW9E sKKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK+wmeckJgdfmL96ooN9Vd1M/pbjkOL9oJV0nL/A6kXKtSdYfQi6DSnZoh7MLrSrHT94fSKnclwCg0Mhw== X-Received: by 10.37.165.6 with SMTP id h6mr2360096ybi.34.1482324442381; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:47:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.165.87 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:47:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <158ddfd1f0b-5980-42e@webprd-a47.mail.aol.com> <584AC31C.20803@posteo.de> <584EAB0D.4060004@posteo.de> <58555BA2.7050709@posteo.de> <1482320831911.81165@kuleuven.be> From: Andy Talbot Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:47:22 +0000 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: b8b011f938af8abc4b241335cabd0691 Subject: LF: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_LF=3A_ULF_experiment=3A_A_MEchanical_Based_Antenna?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8B?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c19fdeed4805005442a8d03 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9879 --94eb2c19fdeed4805005442a8d03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 8000 * 60 =3D 480000 RPM 'jnt On 21 December 2016 at 12:42, Martin Evans wrote: > > Forgive me for asking what may be quite obvious to many - but does this > mean that if I spun a magnet at 8000rpm then I would generate a 8kHz radi= o > signal, identical in every way to an 8kHz signal generated in a more > conventional manner? > > If so, it sounds a lot easier than winding all that wire.....until the > magnet flew apart anyway! > > Martin GW3UCJ Swansea. > > > ever heard of a "A MEchanical Based Antenna=E2=80=8B" ? > > Me neither until today ;-) > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > > --94eb2c19fdeed4805005442a8d03 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
8000 * 60=C2=A0 =3D 480000 RPM

'jnt


On 21 December 2016 at 12:42, Martin Evans <books@mollies.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
=20 =20 =20


=20 =20 Forgive me for asking what may be quite obvious to many - but does this mean that if I spun a magnet at 8000rpm then I would generate a 8kHz radio signal, identical in every way to an 8kHz signal generated in a more conventional manner?

If so, it sounds a lot easier than winding all that wire.....until the magnet flew apart anyway!

Martin=C2=A0 GW3UCJ=C2=A0 Swansea.


ever heard of a "A MEchanical Based Antenna=E2=80=8B" ?

Me neither until today ;-) 73, Rik =C2=A0ON7YD - OR7T




--94eb2c19fdeed4805005442a8d03--