Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uBLCwn5P029175 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:58:50 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cJgQ0-0005z9-Ul for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:54:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cJgQ0-0005yy-L4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:54:52 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cJgPy-0006Yh-5Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:54:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.19] ([2.24.87.48]) by mwinf5d06 with ME id Ncup1u00k12ahiS03cupw1; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:54:49 +0100 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.19] X-ME-Auth: bW9sbGllc0BmcmVlc2VydmUuY28udWs= X-ME-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:54:49 +0100 X-ME-IP: 2.24.87.48 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <158ddfd1f0b-5980-42e@webprd-a47.mail.aol.com> <584AC31C.20803@posteo.de> <584EAB0D.4060004@posteo.de> <58555BA2.7050709@posteo.de> <1482320831911.81165@kuleuven.be> From: Martin Evans Message-ID: <5e649652-3dd6-e453-0b61-fd50939484cf@mollies.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:54:43 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scan-Signature: fbdd513523001863775249cfaf215eac Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_LF:_Re:_LF:_ULF_experiment:_A_MEchanical_Based_Antenn?= =?UTF-8?B?YeKAiw==?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B4E1EF0F639D44D48ADC144D" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9880 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------B4E1EF0F639D44D48ADC144D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ah yes- of course Andy. Better stand well back when I try it then! Martin GW3UCJ. > 8000 * 60 = 480000 RPM > > 'jnt > > > On 21 December 2016 at 12:42, Martin Evans > > > wrote: > > > Forgive me for asking what may be quite obvious to many - but does > this mean that if I spun a magnet at 8000rpm then I would generate > a 8kHz radio signal, identical in every way to an 8kHz signal > generated in a more conventional manner? > > If so, it sounds a lot easier than winding all that wire.....until > the magnet flew apart anyway! > > Martin GW3UCJ Swansea. > >> >> ever heard of a "A MEchanical Based Antenna" ? >> >> Me neither until today ;-) >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> >> > > --------------B4E1EF0F639D44D48ADC144D Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Ah yes- of course Andy.

Better stand well back when I try it then!

Martin GW3UCJ.

8000 * 60 = 480000 RPM

'jnt

On 21 December 2016 at 12:42, Martin Evans <books@mollies.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

Forgive me for asking what may be quite obvious to many - but does this mean that if I spun a magnet at 8000rpm then I would generate a 8kHz radio signal, identical in every way to an 8kHz signal generated in a more conventional manner?

If so, it sounds a lot easier than winding all that wire.....until the magnet flew apart anyway!

Martin GW3UCJ Swansea.

ever heard of a "A MEchanical Based Antenna" ?

Me neither until today ;-)
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T

--------------B4E1EF0F639D44D48ADC144D--