Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uB4MIQoK005927 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 23:18:28 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cDf4F-0005mP-LP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 22:15:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cDf4F-0005mG-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 22:15:31 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cDf4C-00056X-AT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 22:15:30 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C728F20462 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 23:15:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3tX2Jb3f2dz105s for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 23:15:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5844957F.3070004@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 23:15:27 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5843F55D.1020504@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5843F55D.1020504@posteo.de> X-Scan-Signature: 5934134de2d93cab1d5fc440b67de82f Subject: ULF: Finally 100 mA on 2.97 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000808050806070508030101" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9712 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000808050806070508030101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ULF, It was a clear, cold and sunny day again and finally i was testing the new large 2.97 kHz coil on the roof: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/20161204_153126.jpg Not a good idea on MF or LF, but on ULF is can be a good idea to put a resistor in series to the coil. I put 500 Ohm in series. This helps to attenuate eventual HV transients, makes the resonance curve a bit flatter, so the peak is easier to hold. 500 Ohm and 0.1 A, that just a loss of 5W, quite affordable. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/20161204_153113.jpg Unfortunetely i found that the actual resonance region is adjustable from 2993...3130 Hz. So the inductance is still to low :-( I've been quite sure that my antenna replacement capacity for resonance tests in the shack has the right value. So maybe other effects like an additional capacitive load by the things standing arround in the shack? Or a different behaviour of the residual antenna + frozen ground capacity on 2970 Hz? At least it was possible to get 100 mA anyway, just by applying some more voltage to the antenna. The PA is now running at 20V and less than 1A, most of that are PA- and transformer losses. Anyway i have 12 kV on the antenna! That's ULF! I was planning to bring the coil down to the shack anyway, after the 65km experiment which will start in a few days i think. Then i can add more turns to come closer to 2970 Hz. With 70 uOhm radiation resistance the resulting ERP is now entering the microwatt range: *1.2 uW* on the 101km band. A stable carrier at 100 mA was sent from 12:50 UTC to 14:24 UTC. I tried to measure the antenna current with a true rms digital multimeter, shielded by aluminium foil, measuring on high potential. But the measurement was wrong anyway. The permanent installed analog amperemeter and SpecLab gave a correct measurement. Tomorrow i will check the antenna current measurement on high potential with a calibrated analog amperemeter. For the 65km experiment i want to transmit some DFCW-12000 again as well as an EbNaut message. The RX site will be in JN39VH :-) 73, Stefan --------------000808050806070508030101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ULF,

It was a clear, cold and sunny day again and finally i was testing the new large 2.97 kHz coil on the roof: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/20161204_153126.jpg

Not a good idea on MF or LF, but on ULF is can be a good idea to put a resistor in series to the coil. I put 500 Ohm in series. This helps to attenuate eventual HV transients, makes the resonance curve a bit flatter, so the peak is easier to hold.
500 Ohm and 0.1 A, that just a loss of 5W, quite affordable. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/20161204_153113.jpg

Unfortunetely i found that the actual resonance region is adjustable from 2993...3130 Hz. So the inductance is still to low :-( I've been quite sure that my antenna replacement capacity for resonance tests in the shack has the right value. So maybe other effects like an additional capacitive load by the things standing arround in the shack? Or a different behaviour of the residual antenna +  frozen ground capacity on 2970 Hz?
At least it was possible to get 100 mA anyway, just by applying some more voltage to the antenna. The PA is now running at 20V and less than 1A, most of that are PA- and transformer losses. Anyway i have 12 kV on the antenna! That's ULF!
I was planning to bring the coil down to the shack anyway, after the 65km experiment which will start in a few days i think. Then i can add more turns to come closer to 2970 Hz.

With 70 uOhm radiation resistance the resulting ERP is now entering the microwatt range: 1.2 uW on the 101km band.

A stable carrier at 100 mA was sent from 12:50 UTC to 14:24 UTC.

I tried to measure the antenna current with a true rms digital multimeter, shielded by aluminium foil, measuring on high potential. But the measurement was wrong anyway. The permanent installed analog amperemeter and SpecLab gave a correct measurement. Tomorrow i will check the antenna current measurement on high potential with a calibrated analog amperemeter.

For the 65km experiment i want to transmit some DFCW-12000 again as well as an EbNaut message. The RX site will be in JN39VH :-)

73, Stefan


--------------000808050806070508030101--