Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uB4C81e7004374 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:08:02 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cDVXX-0002nN-7G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 12:05:07 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cDVXW-0002nE-Ml for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 12:05:06 +0000 Received: from gmy2-mh807.smtproutes.com ([94.186.192.136]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cDVXT-0003Cw-To for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 12:05:05 +0000 X-Katharion-ID: 1480853094.24222.gmy2-mh807 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.es ([87.216.178.132]) by gmy2-mh807.smtproutes.com [(94.186.192.136)] with ESMTP via TCP (TLSv1/TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA); 04 Dec 2016 12:04:54 +0000 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:04:50 +0100 From: =?Windows-1252?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: De F6CNI : CW QSO PARTY report Thread-Index: AQHSThYIe5gy2joLoUWOsdSw3HCKYaD3ro9W Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:04:49 +0000 Message-ID: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F3F5@servigilant.vigilant.local> References: <38F665123BD04C58B08CF78A0AABB747@malcoHP> <5842FA52.7080604@posteo.de> <6E85CA2FD058424EA9C210FA5A46324B@PCPMF>,<58431CA1.40809@vsas.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F120@servigilant.vigilant.local> <1A0F9D0A9AA34763A3E667502E0030D5@SV8CS>,<556FFEC1688540ABA4FC025EF28020F2@PCPMF> In-Reply-To: <556FFEC1688540ABA4FC025EF28020F2@PCPMF> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [95.17.105.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 3d5b8cd6516ff44ac46de53952029be0 Subject: LF: Re: De F6CNI : CW QSO PARTY report Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F3F5servigilantvigi_" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9687 --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F3F5servigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi MF As told before, the only station received here was DK7FC. Some others hardl= y noticed that they were calling So, as party means FUN and I was getting bored here, tried Roelof PA0RDT Pe= rseus as remote Rx DJ6CB easily copied answering my calls. Then I answered back. No RST as exp= lained that I was receiving via SDR. So no valid QSO but FUN ! I will certenly repeat the experience. It is the only way for me to make CW= QSOs with more stations :-) Hope not to confuse anybody thinking that this are two way QSOs but only on= e way with SDR Rx confirmation Set it on the custer also as a non valid QSO 73 de Luis EA5DOM ________________________________ De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]= en nombre de F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB [f6cni@orange.fr] Enviado: domingo, 4 de diciembre de 2016 9:54 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: LF: De F6CNI : CW QSO PARTY report HI all. For info, my short report about the CW QSO PARTY. I was only QRV receiving = CW, no transmitting. I was listening during 2 periods, each of about 1 hour= 1/2 long. RX FT1000MP full options (a fantastic CW RX on LF/MF) and as RX antenna a v= ertical tube 9.5 m high, base loaded with a L circuit : serial 1.1 mH coil = and 4700 pF capacitor in parallel coaxial side. The window 472 =96 475 kHz band was QRN quiet, but high QRM due to the Pola= nd NDB and his 2 x side AF modulations, which is coming here 589. The segme= nt 474.3 to 475.4 kHz is very clear and for me the best choice for CW, but = nobody was using it... The segment 472 =96 472.7 is also clear but that is = a pity to heard some high power station staying long time on the QRG and ca= lling and calling many and many CQ without having the slightest considerati= on or the politeness for the others. I heard 16 stations in 7 DXCC countries. The first QSO I heard was DJ6CB / G3YXM at 1657 TU. The strongest and best report 599+ to EA5DOM calling some CQ beginning at 1= 822 TU. Some stations was calling him but no QSO. Later he worked DK7FC. Also strong 599 report to DK7FC who had also at times some problems to copy= QRP station calling him. I did not copy my old friend Jeff F6BWO, because I was not listenint at his= QRV time. 73 @++ Andy. --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F3F5servigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi MF

As told before, the only station received here was DK7FC. Some others = hardly noticed that they were calling

So, as party means FUN and I was getting bored here, tried Roelof PA0R= DT Perseus as remote Rx
DJ6CB easily copied answering my calls. Then I answered back. No RST a= s explained that I was receiving
via SDR. So no valid QSO but FUN !

I will certenly repeat the experience. It is the only way for me to ma= ke CW QSOs with more stations :-) 
Hope not to confuse anybody thinking that this are two way QSOs but on= ly one way with SDR Rx confirmation
Set it on the custer also as a non valid QSO

73 de Luis
EA5DOM
De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [o= wner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB [f6cn= i@orange.fr]
Enviado: domingo, 4 de diciembre de 2016 9:54
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: LF: De F6CNI : CW QSO PARTY report

 
HI all.
 
For info, my short report about the CW QSO PARTY. I was only QRV r= eceiving CW, no transmitting. I was listening during 2 periods, each of abo= ut 1 hour 1/2 long.
 
RX FT1000MP full options (a fantastic CW RX on LF/MF) and as RX an= tenna a vertical tube 9.5 m high, base loaded with a L circuit : serial 1.1= mH coil and 4700 pF capacitor in parallel coaxial side.
 
The window 472 =96 475 kHz band was QRN quiet, but high QRM due to= the Poland NDB and his 2 x side AF modulations, which is coming here 589. = The segment 474.3 to 475.4 kHz is very clear and for me the best choice for CW, but nobody was using it... The segment = 472 =96 472.7 is also clear but that is a pity to heard some high power sta= tion staying long time on the QRG and calling and calling many and many CQ = without having the slightest consideration or the politeness for the others.
 
I heard 16 stations in 7 DXCC countries.
 
The first QSO I heard was DJ6CB / G3YXM at 1657 TU.
 
The strongest and best report 599+ to EA5DOM calling some CQ b= eginning at 1822 TU. Some stations was calling him but no QSO. Later he wor= ked DK7FC.
 
Also strong 599 report to DK7FC who had also at times some problem= s to copy QRP station calling him.
 
I did not copy my old friend Jeff F6BWO, because I was not listenint at his QRV ti= me.
 
73 @++ Andy.
 
 
 
 
<= font size=3D"4" face=3D"Calibri"> 
--_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F3F5servigilantvigi_--