MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C3A4A17FE787470A88B9092EBE16AE9A@gnat>
References: <755926527.854934.1479645649028.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <755926527.854934.1479645649028@mail.yahoo.com> <42728F28A2CB4D0688619EA9AA5BA85A@IBM7FFA209F07C>
 <C3A4A17FE787470A88B9092EBE16AE9A@gnat>
From: Lawrence Galea <9h9mhrlaw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 17:34:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFDVXLmSd6pq9prpfKv1C2_8UssRAiXDHN5iFi_0v=3hqYQ+zQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: bounce test
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Content-Length: 2531
Status: O

OK Alan
Thanks

On 11/20/16, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris ....yes you should I do....mostly though some end up in my ISP mail
>
> spam folder.
> However some ISPs regard all mails from self to self as spam .
>
> If you post to the group you will usually get a bounce message from
> "bounce.io" telling you it could not deliver to g3xzx, and including a
> gratuitous advert. it is a way they seek to make money out of this without
> any agreement. They state that the web-host can get a cut of the advertising
>
> revenue, but they make no attempt to contact the web host before enabling
> the interception. I suppose we ought to complain of abuse (if I knew who to
>
> complain to.....feel free if you do know) Unfortunately they only way these
>
> could be stopped is to unsub the address but without admin access we cant do
>
> that and the domain ....an old rsgb one.....is no longer active. So if you
> change addresses PLEASE unsub the old one before it expires and rejoin with
>
> the new one. Fortunaely we have a stable membership or we would be flooded
> with this rubbish
>
> Blacksheep soldiers on now providing service for in excess of 20 years to
> LFers.
>
> Alan
> G3NYK
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris" <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: bounce test
>
>
>> Is this something new? I have always, for years, got a copy of my own
>> messages back.
>> Chris, G4AYT.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "M0FMT" <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
>> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: LF: bounce test
>>
>>
>>> Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the norm now with black-sheep.... :-(
>>>
>>> 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX
>>>
>>> On Sun, 20/11/16, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Subject: LF: bounce test
>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>>> Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:28
>>>
>>> Just to get an example of the
>>> bounce.io response.
>>>
>>> Please note these responses do not suggest your message has
>>> not been
>>> accepted, they show that one members address, now obselete,
>>> cannot be
>>> delivered to. They are only sent to the originator but are a
>>> pain. The owner
>>> of bounce.io has been advised he does not have authority to
>>> intercept these
>>> emails and has been requested to desist.....with no reply of
>>> course.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>> G3NYK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>