Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1481; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id uABM5W2T012619 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:05:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1c5JtA-00015z-2z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:01:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1c5Jt9-00015q-9I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:01:35 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c5Jt5-0004L1-F4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:01:34 +0000 Received: from AGB ([95.151.119.253]) by mwinf5d24 with ME id 6m1P1u0085U7NZ303m1PEX; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:01:28 +0100 X-ME-Helo: AGB X-ME-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:01:28 +0100 X-ME-IP: 95.151.119.253 Message-ID: <8E4F6EC7A5874483AA8CDF58DC108885@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:01:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 161111-0, 11/11/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Signature: 1c38f63d01970a2bf149f660c9cb2a37 Subject: Re: LF: Re: SWR Bridges Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Length: 1545 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9437 Chris , I have the welz 220 swr bridge , its good down to much less than 1 watt and the calibration is quite close , never pushed more than 20 watts through it , always take it out of cct once the system is tuned .. The Bird meter has a coaxial dynamics 250 watt HF element , which reads about 50 watts shy FSD , 250 indicated = 300 actual , its linear , I made a cal chart , reads down to watts at the low end .. I keep that by the Tx 73-Graham -------------------------------------------------- From: "Chris" Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 9:42 AM To: Subject: LF: Re: SWR Bridges > Hi Steve, > I found a lack of sensitivity with my 1.8 - 160MHz Welz SWR/PWR meter on > 630m, so not much good for a few watts, probably OK with high power. I > found the best solution was to build one. > Chris, G4AYT. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 8:52 PM > Subject: LF: SWR Bridges > > >> Has anyone here had experience using (or attempting to use) an HF SWR >> bridge on 630m and if so, what did you find out? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Steve >> >> >> WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl >> >> VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to >> Nanowaves": http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/ >> > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus