Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id uAKD0TZO001963 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:00:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1c8RgA-0004Rq-2a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:57:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1c8Rg9-0004Rh-PL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:57:05 +0000 Received: from rgout0103.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.123] helo=rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c8Rg7-0001T8-9G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:57:04 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.191.81.210 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: c.ashby435@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50,refid=2.7.2:2016.11.20.122116:17:8.129,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1000_1099, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_P, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, REFERENCES, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, NO_URI_HTTPS, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, LEGITIMATE_NEGATE Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (86.191.81.210) by rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.07.01-1) (authenticated as c.ashby435@btinternet.com) id 582DBAFD003CD89B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:57:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1479646623; bh=apTk0iTIydn8inD1w+ds7TV+nxtzcqizPG82yMTBgt8=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=H3/z5v1VlFhXs1YiTDYidkCfysCDrzgnLNScw84E7aKaDZX7xYJgvXM3Kq0Xo/cjSNpH2bGjRAN7ijh+bRTFcGEk4LAcZ/bbw5Pes+9npVaX3K/sN4LC8HiQ3pQqzoK/7QNdBuJmj9F0BG3SjQPrNwkYd5FvXvkoHT0gtrwKRGw= Message-ID: <42728F28A2CB4D0688619EA9AA5BA85A@IBM7FFA209F07C> From: "Chris" To: References: <755926527.854934.1479645649028.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <755926527.854934.1479645649028@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:57:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: bounce test Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Length: 1029 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9496 Is this something new? I have always, for years, got a copy of my own messages back. Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" To: Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:40 PM Subject: Re: LF: bounce test > Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the norm now with black-sheep.... :-( > > 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX > > On Sun, 20/11/16, Alan Melia wrote: > > Subject: LF: bounce test > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:28 > > Just to get an example of the > bounce.io response. > > Please note these responses do not suggest your message has > not been > accepted, they show that one members address, now obselete, > cannot be > delivered to. They are only sent to the originator but are a > pain. The owner > of bounce.io has been advised he does not have authority to > intercept these > emails and has been requested to desist.....with no reply of > course. > > Alan > G3NYK > > > >