Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u9PGpVJm013778 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:51:31 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bz4tl-0006qt-6o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:48:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bz4tk-0006qk-DA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:48:24 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bz4tg-0005pO-M8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:48:23 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c78so173608820wme.0 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NvTyuTwgEOI55Cf0o7zvCFCvS4RZx1gLZoyzlDfwikc=; b=zWUAekqx0yNqDS4XAu8RDmBAawSTvGMIemCXOMg8UVDGffZ0TGUFRNRP9NDqtstQuz ZOaMZGDbo+Ntq4P+cefG3K3DNBYzCsb3LDhBIMMBhpHJWtTZn/ElYBPLCG0iVxiEtDfH cyesjroSwBNdAkdv0BVKOUYLlXy2CsRyn8lLbwcNJAlhQGdHfR6MUT9uiCmdat4wYrY6 4gWx9D8eUsRgSTBK79RHIUZW/yFu5kjI9uKxa4H30LiDxmZbrpru+gXzBQvAHVdpYSlW nXnjIkRZsYgZ/WMPa5qnPBYGxh3LMKUcvvKGgtFND4ZPi8XHvwZ32rQyGE5FudOoIyrI lfoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NvTyuTwgEOI55Cf0o7zvCFCvS4RZx1gLZoyzlDfwikc=; b=Wmo/ncDv7phf/KIzaW1Jesbzgefj50umLq1QJd7Z3Y4bzjry8LWqrk9Fli0sMZDApr TZg7vmDP45mUD+Fv2qRZJ7FZlBFm5xzwuIOF6Fq/vIQxG37WMfmcG/at/M3rFgypa1Cb RvR8XPdoobcHujwroN5NcI4eqPtgAF98kblgivPRp0UvIOSwSF0r0x9GPhdL1SoNVWv7 ihF3rVrrEHKWCZEMobVSlAqfNnez/4vCsDVZaX9XErPa5W44BdvI7Th9xGQEkxKdfcnM P/tQ9UlLdEzPsnjc4f8GJoAEYvNUkzc7+9vOu8LOuWbfcAVUH9JXyx1rMlcYcTSMZg2a uvzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc+lb41abJ9jF9eK2aPwFB/Rzqeqc6l8gr0jV2+EX6aBv52N941XrYHkZ54qka1MQ== X-Received: by 10.28.45.69 with SMTP id t66mr4507672wmt.46.1477414098077; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (net-37-182-103-27.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [37.182.103.27]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id wn5sm25987633wjb.42.2016.10.25.09.48.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:48:17 -0700 (PDT) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <580F0C19.9090708@vsas.de> From: IZ7SLZ Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:48:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <580F0C19.9090708@vsas.de> X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: MF QRA64 / improved JT65 decoder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Length: 1411 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9229 Hello MF, during last night i was very happy to have a QRA64 QSO with IW4DXW, DK6XY, G6AVK and also to decode some qtc from Mal G3KEV. Many thanks also to Vincent, Dionysios and Marco for watching the activities. But my first impression is, as also reported by Vincent, that there are no actually big improvement respect to JT9. BTW, Colin G6AVK reports his difficulties to have a DX QSO using JT9 but yesterday QSO was obtained. We will compare the results after the JT9 party at the week end. I also will be there with pleasure ! GL es 73, Domenico iz7slz On 10/25/2016 9:39 AM, Vincent Stallbaum wrote: > Hello MF, > > G3KEV, IW4DXW, IZ7SLZ and LA3EQ have been copied vy well in JO30nx nr > Cologne. > > QRA64 seems to make a good job, but I didn't see advantages in compare > to JT9 so far. > > > This may be worth a try, too: JTDX (by UA3DJY) has an improved JT65 > decoder. It's using a deep search method 'hinted decoding' with help > of already known callsigns. This gives abt 3dB to your RX and helps > during QSB. The biggest advantage for me is the capability to decode > multiple signals on the same QRG when your're calling CQ. > > You can find JTDX here: > http://www.qrz.lt/ly3bg/JTDX/jtdx.html > https://www.facebook.com/groups/JTDX.HF.evaluation/ > But take care of your WSJT-X.ini ! > (http://www.qrz.lt/ly3bg/JTDX/info/instal.html#notes) > > > > vy73 > Vinny, DL6II > >