Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1481; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u9RHrbPc023049
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:53:37 +0200
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1bzoku-0003dG-So
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:46:20 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1bzoku-0003d7-Bt
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:46:20 +0100
Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk)
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>)
	id 1bzokq-0000A6-U0
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:46:19 +0100
Received: from AGB ([95.151.119.248])
	by mwinf5d61 with ME
	id 0hmC1u0065Mf0rj03hmCLb; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:46:15 +0200
X-ME-Helo: AGB
X-ME-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:46:15 +0200
X-ME-IP: 95.151.119.248
Message-ID: <9572E499DDB04CCFB514F52495231E80@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <1025448629.20161021150108@chriswilson.tv> <8239C38A828A4235981A7EC5FD32DA42@PCPMF> <1838496439.20161027150949@chriswilson.tv>
In-Reply-To: <1838496439.20161027150949@chriswilson.tv>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:46:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f
Subject: Re: LF: Distance of LF vertical antenna element from lattice work steel mast?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11
Content-Length: 1528
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 9261

Chris ,

Are you maintaining  the  loop Ae , which at the  moment is  tilted , would 
the  modifications , render it  more  'horizontal ?

Q where is the  'star point of the  earth system ?

73-Graham



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Chris Wilson" <chris@chriswilson.tv>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 3:09 PM
To: "F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: Distance of LF vertical antenna element from lattice work 
steel mast?

> Hello F6CNI,
>
> Friday, October 21, 2016
>
> Thanks   Andy,   and   thanks  Rik,  excellent  info  and  link,  much
> appreciated.  I  may  initially  keep  the vertical well away from the
> mast,  but  future ergonomics would be helped by bringing it nearer to
> the mast. For now, when my pulleys arrive, I will see what raising the
> corner  of  the  existing  loop and heightening the vertical add to my
> signal. Cheers.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Chris  2E0ILY                          mailto:chris@chriswilson.tv
>
>
>
>> Hello Chris.
>
>> In the year 2000 on LF I had a stell 14 meters mast supporting the top of
>> the vertical thin wire of my transmitting Inv L antenna.
>
>> I tried some distances between the mast and the vertical wire. With close
>> distance as 50 cm, I had some capacitance added and it had very influence 
>> on
>> the tuning unit, and sure bad result about the antenna efficiency. With 2
>> meters of spacing or over, all was OK and the mast seems to have very 
>> little
>> influence.
>
>> 73 Andy.
>
>
>
>