Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u9SJXvtO028291 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:33:57 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1c0CrU-0006At-Sa for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:30:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1c0CrU-0006Aj-Ig for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:30:44 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c0CrS-000750-1E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:30:43 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6790320833 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:30:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3t5DPX0Vlmz105l for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:30:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5813A75F.7080605@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:30:39 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15805f47723.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <58120ACB.7090803@posteo.de> <58120D29.1030409@vsas.de> In-Reply-To: <58120D29.1030409@vsas.de> X-Scan-Signature: b45446db24846e84db90eb694609e205 Subject: Re: LF: Some QRP on MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000705000708040206010503" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Length: 3119 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9276 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000705000708040206010503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Vinny, Don't worry, its all right ;-) I find the results quite good for 0.2 W TX power, ODX was Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2016-10-27 20:42 DK7FC 0.475682 -28 0 JN49ik 1 OH6JKN KP22xk 1789 30 I will be somewhat stronger tomorrow on the party... Looking forward to that... 73, Stefan Am 27.10.2016 16:20, schrieb Vincent Stallbaum: > Are you ill Stefan? I really worry abt you HI. > > 74 > Vinny > > > Am 27.10.2016 16:10, schrieb DK7FC: >> Hi MF, >> >> Today i'm running some QRP on MF, just for fun. >> >> Raspberry Pi -> ICL7667CPA @ 13.8VDC -> pi-filter -> antenna matched >> to 50 Ohm >> >> I measured 3.4 V rms on a 50 Ohm dummy load, i.e. abt 23 dBm output. >> >> What could the ODX become this night, with such inefficient amateur >> antennas?!! :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> > > --------------000705000708040206010503 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Vinny,

Don't worry, its all right ;-)
I find the results quite good for 0.2 W TX power, ODX was

Timestamp	Call	MHz	SNR	Drift	Grid	Pwr	Reporter	RGrid	km	az
2016-10-27 20:42	DK7FC	0.475682	-28	0	JN49ik	1	OH6JKN	KP22xk	1789	30

I will be somewhat stronger tomorrow on the party...
Looking forward to that...

73, Stefan

Am 27.10.2016 16:20, schrieb Vincent Stallbaum:

Are you ill Stefan? I really worry abt you HI.

74
Vinny

Am 27.10.2016 16:10, schrieb DK7FC:

Hi MF,

Today i'm running some QRP on MF, just for fun.

Raspberry Pi -> ICL7667CPA @ 13.8VDC -> pi-filter -> antenna matched to 50 Ohm

I measured 3.4 V rms on a 50 Ohm dummy load, i.e. abt 23 dBm output.

What could the ODX become this night, with such inefficient amateur antennas?!! :-)

73, Stefan

--------------000705000708040206010503--