Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1481; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u8JJIsbo031468 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:18:54 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bm41x-00072W-DM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 20:15:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bm41w-00072N-Tr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 20:15:04 +0100 Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com ([212.50.160.34]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bm41u-0004Sy-8v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 20:15:03 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,363,1470697200"; d="scan'208";a="170837428" Received: from unknown (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([109.176.249.184]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2016 20:15:00 +0100 Message-ID: <57E03937.2090308@lineone.net> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 20:15:03 +0100 From: LineOne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <57DFBEB8.7010207@lineone.net> In-Reply-To: X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: Re: LF: A few reports Sept 18th to 19th Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8801 Hello Graham. It was a suspect positive at 1702 but it's a bit too late to double check the dynamic list and other receiving stations though I recall transmissions were listed at several times in succession but differ from my report. I suppose there are other possibilities such as his entering the wrong frequency. Rightly or wrongly my posting was only information for the sending stations and I naturally rejected all the other suspect reports. 73, Hugh, M0DSZ On 19/09/2016 16:27, Graham wrote: > Hugh > > For the call to be in the dynamic list , it has to be either by > the TX station using the opera app and setting TX with 136 > selected , the web - beacon will update the system , or QTY 2 > decodes of the same call by other stations ... > > The call must of been in the list , for you to spot it .. [ > dynamic only compares the call's listed ] > > If the class cannot use 136 , then its possible you have a false > positive > > Where you the only station to see the call at 17-02 ? if so, > then the web linked spot would of been stamped '??' > > 73-G, > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "LineOne" > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 11:32 AM > To: ; > Subject: LF: A few reports Sept 18th to 19th > >> A few reports overnight from Sept 18th to 19th: >> >> WSPR15 >> 1600 -13 0.8 0.137620 1 DK7FC JN49 30 >> 1630 -14 0.8 0.137620 0 DK7FC JN49 30 >> and then consistently until: >> 2330 -12 0.4 0.137620 0 DK7FC JN49 30 >> 0030 -34 0.4 0.137603 0 R7NT KN97 53 >> 0230 -35 0.4 0.137603 0 R7NT KN97 53 >> 2145 -9 -0.6 0.137623 0 G8HUH IO81 20 >> 2215 -11 -0.9 0.137623 0 G8HUH IO81 20 >> >> WSPR2 >> 0850 -32 -0.5 0.137459 0 DF1VB JO31 13 437 >> >> OPERA32 >> 17:02 -42 1468.4 Hz DO5JWA >> (deep search: appears to be correct) >> >> Hugh, M0DSZ >> > >