Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1481; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u7UJNSLI010106 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:23:28 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1beoXp-0004DM-Rr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:18:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1beoXo-0004DD-Oa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:18:00 +0100 Received: from smtp-out01.xworks.net ([31.25.48.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1beoXn-00074I-5Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:17:59 +0100 Received: from mailbackend1 (cluster06.xworks.net [10.100.1.80]) by smtp-out01.xworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B976060CE9 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:17:56 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1472584676; bh=L3pzvfywHdEqrZmNQ5X8RH5yChKLHSEaEhFXTF0HtCE=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Content-Type; b=IEbICVU17IBiCmC9JBzWigSUJUzAC/5Hs0LwWysgMFSvIMhzIdJCevSS3epb4P46z AZfmCAOd1sdBpXUDdWJxrjj2WBav7aDHz6DhdroZhbFPib99VjcvizKVkKIv7Us9pe +UppqRv8m0e78Nu/GB5i0mKj7jGVkOGWknOH89A0= Received: from [192.168.178.33] (ipbcc15037.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [188.193.80.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com with ESMTP id u7UJHsCQ013257 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:17:55 +0200 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [188.193.80.55] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [DK1IS@kabelmail.de] To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: From: DK1IS Message-ID: <18fc8dcb-a964-9905-e384-385d67a22ecb@kabelmail.de> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:23:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-mediaBEAM-AuthCheck: route13 X-mediaBEAM-AuthScore: 1.6/5.0, scanned in 0.937sec X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: Re: LF: VLF DHO38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8653 Am 30.08.2016 um 18:26 schrieb Peter: > Hi, > > DHO38 was/is active on 16.4, 18.4, 23.4 and 34.9 kHz today. > > Temporary simultaneously on 2 frequencies. > > 73 de df3lp, > Peter > Hi Peter, Interesting! 34.9 kHz is new for me. I ask myself how they get the bandwidth for simultanious service. But they have 8 masts there with individual feeding - perhaps they use 4 and 4. Anyway a challenge concerning the radiation coupling normally used on this not extremely large area (see https://www.google.de/maps/@53.0789523,7.6144968,3155m/data=!3m1!1e3) What about the fieldstrenghts compared with normal service? How did you identfy them? 73, Tom, DK1IS