Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u6UGSpQD024412 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:28:51 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bTX3m-0006Ol-NX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 17:24:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bTX3k-0006Oc-OO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 17:24:20 +0100 Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <9h9mhrlaw@gmail.com>) id 1bTX3i-0004XE-Ee for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 17:24:19 +0100 Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id x130so73925011vkc.0 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 09:24:18 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d4PTogGpI867LGiCInHHtqUW/ey+FDr0kJFe4epxiUo=; b=t1MMzCYMzu7A4AUoMOKZ8Ax8ilNxnqP7h8p5hDMb0RGBI+1LTI56zFYSr0C/p+k5Wh J3CNcb5aU6YM+ugIQTzCq64sqQorEQJFoU2rakQwQk4nArWRtnhw5kJFvt6A+cx69Bnu p9Bh1e8C1Pw4mrCiiko7ivIle2eX/VPUmBGOjUiPrt+8ox29JyMdSxYhw5SQE2l+Vkx+ G+oA8sGPRXAx9d3zWeTsLM20yHDuvi96ACsemt+29i9+swADN8bgfKvz6r5/BZwR33+6 n9ZQC7tzZQAleUr1JLXVmVVYPeo6iIvOYrQxy0zmArTH/PBRX+BZy+fZqaQ++oqw56dT rpbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d4PTogGpI867LGiCInHHtqUW/ey+FDr0kJFe4epxiUo=; b=f12n26jTN1UZR094OvmD46vjpu3ygxvHNtwmoYcU9fzaV8anjIlXz55XVfwYQKef9R mdRHemz0sY+yES86mtMgk9SW9Fxbs02WRAB+9F8zKGWdSd8Asmijjn3bAXaejeT2bx47 oOgGGlko69k1vBreyNstcrwyRy5K6C/YgJTeyuiQLksbdMzzOEzoHt1Bmf3+Jo8Bv44t ZA1F6g+lHKzjG04yA53zUwg/Dut0A1MIL8oInvqTDZr0Rsc3fB4Rc5bxELbT4c7IZemt 2V9Ln0kiuUDtc1vruiEOwtoE4JTt3jGgZRGYvXFtmvoHYADo4ZLufqC4WZpmZmkiK3i1 oUJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvUALIIT1Bauw9Y3dy3MpbmelC/l8qjDdNjMu1XNBwhzyiWlSZ7R2JJQ8gXACWZdwnhjyRXhfrZJSzhXg== X-Received: by 10.31.16.12 with SMTP id g12mr21906567vki.66.1469895855920; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.74.8 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000001d1ea6e$db4c5510$91e4ff30$@t-online.de> References: <733942171.20160730141305@chriswilson.tv> <000001d1ea6e$db4c5510$91e4ff30$@t-online.de> From: Lawrence Galea <9h9mhrlaw@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:24:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: c9c533f07c530c146486ecf89a00ebb1 Subject: Re: LF: AW: My active whip antenna has gone noisy and insensitive Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id u6UGSpQD024412 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8474 Did you consider whether you or anyone in your neighbourhood have installed any PV panels recently? Regards Lawrence On 7/30/16, Hans Joachim Brandt wrote: > Dear Chris, > > I am using an active antenna using an operational amplifier OP27; the > circuit had been published in the german CQ-DL May 2007. This circuit is > employing two protection diodes 1N4148 at the positive gate input (both > cathodes in direction to the plus voltage). Additionally a series resistor > of 47 ohms maximum has been used between the active antenna area and the IC > positive input and another resistor of 12 kOhm between the positive input > and a blocking capacitor (at this capacitor the DC voltage is half the > total > supply of 12 volts. The negative input of this IC is connected to the IC > output by an 1kOhms resistor. Until today I have never encountered any > damage of the IC or its input gate. I guess such a gate protection should > be > included into every active antenna circuit. Another advantage of using such > an operating amplifier is a supply current of just 10 mA! Sorry to say that > for the moment, due to a change of the computer, I do not have a circuit > copy available for this active antenna. > > HW? > > 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] Im Auftrag von Chris Wilson > Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juli 2016 15:13 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: LF: My active whip antenna has gone noisy and insensitive > > 30 July 2016 > > > I have a a clone PA0RDT active mini whip antenna atop a wind up mast that > used to work well, but has recently become insensitive and very noisy. I > will pull it down later and first check the co ax. If I remove its in shack > power source the noise stops though, and I have tried it on a battery in > case the PSU had gone noisy, but no difference in noise on battery power is > seen. The circuit is at http://dl1dbc.net/SAQ/Mwhip/pa0rdt-Mini-Whip.pdf > Can > anyone say if the front end FET may have gone faulty, or what to check > please? Thanks! > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > Chris 2E0ILY mailto:chris@chriswilson.tv > > My part time LF grabber is at > http://www.chriswilson.tv/grabber.html > > > >