Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u6EB7svj019382 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:07:54 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bNePd-0003xR-1P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:02:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bNePc-0003xI-GQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:02:36 +0100 Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bNePX-0005a9-Ot for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:02:35 +0100 Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u186so44581596ita.0 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:02:31 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=TZs+ibDQOvmxFTYTdHMAzMKuxtfHmDMTF1tLH9hNF1c=; b=iIPiwGceCXb1qTNXJmsrnIS2zAp4NYKWUMgdZeXS82WC5K2Nm+3uBdbcuWTIdgrsmc p7SkNDIlZFWy5rxzuNtWpQWJSxGbx/xv3MmIZxGCmuxZjVekM/9GnvPA93ZHHShTYgV0 iqxyBijIVKobVP3JFIgZYvVsmNC+Y5zkJG5bSB5/yc6Tpnu47eZEq4XzPJaOVOjAuD3R blyQOl7iBC043cBdgblJOJeGiGja1wEch2iBaJ6dlB/7j2o/geDxYBVXPT0JF9+dZrBa yeomU9AEumb5X/NKTDRh31uLqkx55/z+A1WEDfd892rZQ3uaE3PXj26CZ3cwfHB4cN0a y4sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=TZs+ibDQOvmxFTYTdHMAzMKuxtfHmDMTF1tLH9hNF1c=; b=aoyKU9WX79NOQhSfo5rQwqsfSsVW2XkGGfZfFiX3XNqaH3OGUKo0wB+009aIhbMP0q 33VK+ObTsIKrWRpEEfOvLx+DYvPyS+naAE3Funi/922yBmmvWtNkDjCg/W52U87C556q V4KvoN5t6dtGHTMUPZTXBdakCN3jhqoS6kc+pDEsX0j1hLpAFU70Gbtm+2nM+AH/w0lg lTh/PoOkWJBNPUnm9EKrZ1ZOT8l2j8hoN9FrOxoVnPcXQaYaPUB3Xwpax/7yJLMAgnZx olhild6NuIjeNzAUmMYjp9kXml/JbjIFQfTqLeLDs5cFd3gGG4L/5ZqcL0joAx/6KQWf imaA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJry/ob2gNI15rgUdJKF3BYRiUgGKzpkdfzF/6AMvKcgg/m+kRtWAeonSrvQJ6bSAopDF+yfbPspskc2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.142.7 with SMTP id h7mr4869044ite.65.1468494149606; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.74.83 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.74.83 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:02:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <699007789.4519784.1468489028737.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <699007789.4519784.1468489028737.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <699007789.4519784.1468489028737.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:02:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: Richard S To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: 6b0411a0208d534ec13cf5eb48c0cfb7 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c04ad1a2466b6053796702a X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8376 --94eb2c04ad1a2466b6053796702a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh dear, the Brits feel left out of SAQ! 14 lip 2016 09:45 "M0FMT" napisa=C5=82(a): > Hi all > > I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as > perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much higher than > elsewhere. > > Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to SM no doubt > contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been consistently lar= ge > over many years. > > It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but don't report > in.... a bit unlikely. > > Many thanks for the suggestions. > > Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic. > > 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX > > > > -------------------------------------------- > On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot wrote: > > Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47 > > And > because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from > that by now.Been there, done that > Andy G4JNT > On 13 July 2016 at 19:30, > Chris > wrote: > Probably > because it's so easy and we've done it many times > before? > > G4AYT. > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM > > Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote: > > > ... > > Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116 > ? > > > > > Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK > receiving SAQ ? > > > > Peter > > > > PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav > > > > > > > > > --94eb2c04ad1a2466b6053796702a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oh dear, the Brits feel left out of SAQ!

14 lip 2016 09:45 "M0FMT" <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk> napisa=C5=82(a):
Hi all

I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as perplexi= ng as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much higher than elsewhere.

Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to SM no doubt=C2= =A0 contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been consistently l= arge over many years.

It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but don't report = in.... a bit unlikely.

Many thanks for the suggestions.

Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic.

73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX


--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot <an= dy.g4jnt@gmail.com> wrote:

=C2=A0Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
=C2=A0To: rsgb_lf_group@bla= cksheep.org
=C2=A0Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47

=C2=A0And
=C2=A0because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from
=C2=A0that by now.Been there, done that
=C2=A0Andy =C2=A0G4JNT
=C2=A0On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,
=C2=A0Chris <c.ashby435@bti= nternet.com>
=C2=A0wrote:
=C2=A0Probably
=C2=A0because it's so easy and we've done it many times
=C2=A0before?

=C2=A0G4AYT.

=C2=A0----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" <pws@df3lp.de>

=C2=A0To: <rsgb_lf_group= @blacksheep.org>

=C2=A0Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM

=C2=A0Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics






=C2=A0Hi,



=C2=A0On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:


=C2=A0...

=C2=A0Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116
=C2=A0?




=C2=A0Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK
=C2=A0receiving SAQ ?



=C2=A0Peter



=C2=A0PS: http://lf-ra= dio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav








--94eb2c04ad1a2466b6053796702a--