Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u6E9mKR1019167 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:48:21 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bNd51-0003Um-Bk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:37:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bNd50-0003Ud-M6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:37:14 +0100 Received: from nm5-vm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.96.116]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bNd4x-00057n-Vc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:37:13 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1468489029; bh=Lm8pTnqT6uvHHbs7DLVd9e+oq3gr2SVh3cLm9Dz/k7o=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=MwG8A73iRh9dt4Y3Ubqii2i20S1K5bQgETHH0klWXRbfWmVeaKDjnvkh9jCEEVTGMiv5RnJ6UvA/SxPjneCLgkPnGO2ufeOopBj0U9qnZIuFWtqyevn14+Jmwh1XHdboT1dchIvmLtOcVpwtagnpwKGi2bFrjLT4z8yN9PMBzcG3OHuoYpJ1IH5yRwv3BpH9aIDtq4T8dXHBSQu2sDirzQFqplWgxRK5BbW2OLQ/6WrGLu1oLozaRS+zOqdoxfniPMFBONThrTcknthRHUrzribhZSyCJOavH11G7lSCTNWVD6pUxw6V1XUw7pO318ndFFFk3pOm4Oj84ksrKJhtuw== Received: from [212.82.98.62] by nm5.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2016 09:37:09 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.103] by tm15.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2016 09:37:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1040.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2016 09:37:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 556446.39248.bm@omp1040.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: 3FzCh1UVM1mYnQo19D07P.eWw.ObloKhUjTRAxlDpPI6XBX.Yzt2HBZ8R4kYAWg s66Zk03XP_lYepWNHMMx7fMAv71nAcZXFos3tfJFHb.6tyHiYVTKe1i_wfa9kExg3To4fi._XBFj fW7DZVR2qUuA3EiS94987_vpEbwcIl2mo4ny_T_nIj2oDCI8ISM462NK0qqG..89RYKVMW82d2B9 SQsVEYxesK7FVNqO1kIAy9SWmLCSvSbqOuk4ujXavYJsm9PpOiaGVMpz62k.DV1GCgZJ29D1m_fx iMjE3xIhG_O8ofnMwuyrqQu_bz4bni7sfINKyim_YNECOXAXEedGxX.2A2z0o5n9oL5xxtqsN66f CqQyVFugpb8nnP3PUkn5DWc3LG7rhF.fheglWDwyI3ohMTyn4ggdnA.rmkrAb6i4n_zmXkwpIQ6K GniFSM_9nAVYUYpeTVpfmYJwBWjy8G4fXHOgM75cDWAGk7N7W3KLX86jodIA78ZgQeFAowEzxXUl dbSan_sTf0.2ixI2bysYhc4icVQI- Received: from jws11184.mail.ir2.yahoo.com by sendmailws104.mail.ir2.yahoo.com; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:37:09 +0000; 1468489029.125 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:37:08 +0000 (UTC) From: M0FMT To: Message-ID: <699007789.4519784.1468489028737.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <699007789.4519784.1468489028737.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Scan-Signature: 1bc6486c2865e7dc2ff7578e6d7fc226 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id u6E9mKR1019167 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8372 Hi all I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much higher than elsewhere. Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to SM no doubt contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been consistently large over many years. It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but don't report in.... a bit unlikely. Many thanks for the suggestions. Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot wrote: Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47 And because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from that by now.Been there, done that Andy  G4JNT On 13 July 2016 at 19:30, Chris wrote: Probably because it's so easy and we've done it many times before? G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics Hi, On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote: ... Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116 ? Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK receiving SAQ ? Peter PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav