Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u6UHNpv3024574 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 19:23:52 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bTXvS-0006WS-9S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:19:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bTXvR-0006WJ-FX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:19:49 +0100 Received: from fish2.hurontel.on.ca ([216.46.129.163]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bTXvP-0004iG-Mi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:19:48 +0100 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1469899183-0718de5cce06060001-a32kfu Received: from [192.168.1.100] (pppoe.dyn-96-44-63-92.hurontel.on.ca [96.44.63.92]) by fish2.hurontel.on.ca with ESMTP id pGCHfRaB6KBYSoQc for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 13:19:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: weazle@hurontel.on.ca X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: pppoe.dyn-96-44-63-92.hurontel.on.ca[96.44.63.92] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 96.44.63.92 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) From: John Bruce McCreath X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: LF: AW: My active whip antenna has gone noisy and insensitive In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 13:19:43 -0400 Message-Id: <49238AF6-87F9-4170-9A53-A3C0964D9A14@hurontel.on.ca> References: <733942171.20160730141305@chriswilson.tv> <000001d1ea6e$db4c5510$91e4ff30$@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Barracuda-Connect: pppoe.dyn-96-44-63-92.hurontel.on.ca[96.44.63.92] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1469899183 X-Barracuda-URL: https://fish.hurontel.on.ca:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 672 X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at hurontel.on.ca X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.31631 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: LF: AW: My active whip antenna has gone noisy and insensitive X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id u6UHNpv3024574 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8475 > Did you consider whether you or anyone in your neighbourhood have installed any PV panels recently? > > Regards Lawrence I realize that every installation of PV arrays is different, but I think they are being given a bad rap. For over 16 years, all of my shack has been powered by solar panels, including devices that are operating from 120 Volts AC, produced by an inverter which gets its DC directly from the panels. I've worked DX on many bands using many modes and have never experienced problems with interference. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't think that's the case. 73, J.B., VE3EAR LowFER Beacon "EAR" 188.830 kHz. QRSS30 EN93dr