Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u5OCKXjA026876 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:20:33 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bGQ17-0006gB-Rb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:15:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bGQ17-0006g2-Bl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:15:25 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bGQ15-0000jF-NF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:15:24 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F3520B49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3rbcjL3dJCz1063 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:15:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <576D2454.7000306@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:15:16 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB53C65519@servigilant.vigilant.local> <576CEFAF.4040701@posteo.de> <3f5412f0-8fee-5fa9-fd0e-6e7d6d3071f1@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: <3f5412f0-8fee-5fa9-fd0e-6e7d6d3071f1@kabelmail.de> X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: Cumiana OOS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8290 Hi Tom, I doubt that these voltage transformers will handle 1 kW. Actually their power is rated at a few 10W at 50 Hz. You would then suggest to use them in a non-resonant antenna matching? I am also quite sure that they will not manage 2970 Hz at a reasonable voltage. Another thing is their self-resonance frequency or internal capacity. I have tried various methods, also ring core mains transformers which gave the 2nd best results in my tests. What i'm starting next is a multi-layer 'air-cored' coil with stacked windings, as announced. The 250 mm PVC tube, 2 kg of 0.4mm and the Kapton tape is already here. I will need 6 km of wire!! The goal is 40 kV at 2970 Hz :-) 73, Stefan Am 24.06.2016 11:55, schrieb DK1IS: > Am 24.06.2016 um 10:30 schrieb DK7FC: >> Ignition coils, well, they may handle the voltage but i think the >> winding will become to warm at 30 mA 24/7. But the main problem would >> be that i need a certain inductance because it is a resonated >> circuit. So i need an adjustable air gap into the ferrite material, >> like i have in my arrangement. Also, the ignition coil may generate >> (and temporary hold) 20 kV but i don't assume that it can generate >> that voltage at 2.97 kHz but just on higher frequencies. It is the >> same with the old TV transformers (LOPT). They may generate 3 kV but >> not at 2.97 kHz. There, they would saturate. Of course i already >> checked that a long time ago :-) >> >> > Hi Stefan, > just another idea: what about old voltage transformers > (Spannungswandler) from your local utility company, at least for a > test? The 20-kV-versions should have an insulation test voltage of 50 > kV against ground and secondary winding, the nominal secondary voltage > is 100 V at 50 Hz. They have high-quality iron cores and should > core-wise be able to handle more than 1 kW at 3 kHz. Following your > own transductor idea, you could superimpose a DC component in series > to the AC signal on the secondary (now primary) winding to tune the > inductivity. Weak points could be the current capability especially of > the primary (now secondary) windig and its resonance frequency - this > has just to be tested. > > 73 es gl, > Tom, DK1IS > >