Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, PLING_QUERY,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u4G92q83032657 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 11:02:52 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1b2EH7-0002BM-5J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 09:53:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1b2EH6-0002BD-L5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 09:53:16 +0100 Received: from smtp-out01.xworks.net ([31.25.48.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1b2EH5-0002vJ-0H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 09:53:15 +0100 Received: from mailbackend3 (cluster06.xworks.net [10.100.1.80]) by smtp-out01.xworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3774614D5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 10:53:08 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1463388788; bh=gHJrjrD869mSC5hP5MGOMZj/Jnr9px4QbrukWfWXWjs=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Content-Type; b=UF+uepPHV1+pbaDjxAihsrrUhmXYowwQ3EwQHZ2iv3WLcssjdLLyylp0ZWQ3Sr7ax sTPsSP1Dqhk3Xysu5y5TgYVG8IW0GQJutDLiAP+UrkdbHqxUck6ceJPnhWeqiatL+Y eA7Nj3zSnhkhboHIzRZaMHdqrLcUYv9BdXUGCro8= Received: from [192.168.178.33] (ipbcc1500e.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [188.193.80.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com with ESMTP id u4G8r4JM030695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 10:53:07 +0200 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [188.193.80.14] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [DK1IS@kabelmail.de] To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5737138D.4050807@posteo.de> <245E116B-93B7-4A7D-AD24-FA4B8A8898BA@hurontel.on.ca> <1771641848.20160514171621@chriswilson.tv> <57385CB1.2060207@posteo.de> From: DK1IS Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:53:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57385CB1.2060207@posteo.de> X-mediaBEAM-AuthCheck: route13 X-mediaBEAM-AuthScore: 1.9/5.0, scanned in 1.301sec X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8086 Hi Stefan, > The only thing that is can't understand: If this is a known circuit, > why does no one of use it for LF and MF for an easy resonance > tuning?????? > From my former experiences with my students: the "normal" electrician usually feels magnetic effects as if a little bit scary ... ;-) 73, Tom, DK1IS