Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u3PCneQ4024003 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:49:40 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1auftl-0003xb-AQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:45:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1auftk-0003xS-Pd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:45:56 +0100 Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1aufti-0002hk-Ma for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:45:55 +0100 Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t10so207363440ywa.0 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 05:45:54 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=c7SiOIatVr7ylqS60DXkAe+96LQBRmFDa82O+fNWaOc=; b=zzGJ1IDdCYN+q9dCsnM7GevFGrqFe/AemmFCsYSI4jsyxMs0x3N+9oq6MIAA6lFqUg uQLuqsiTra3S9KFcJTXEg62GHHA7M+BZRn8zHi4P3ymkXLfl/HJfiZ7MxXc5lyp2FEoN AkiED6Kxu1t8syW/nhmvTuOiu+dZZagqoV0WKMO2adOINkOid6q5zxr/3S73wJaHwsLW INyDFRZs9Te7t8Fh+9F2b/+sRmZCUkSx1241SReDftd0LkkN3846g9w73Hnu5IenLXNC 8+PTmmOayBk1wcHmcggMMRXFAtFAikHWRBPwz6yaznwJ7OJW907IxZce1MVITtdCz3aQ 6vFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=c7SiOIatVr7ylqS60DXkAe+96LQBRmFDa82O+fNWaOc=; b=gaCGtLzDR1vZx+ZBK/yBjEw3qZBR7DoGJntkUUDSFGExjfSus7ooDKhtd3GCHR9hvh HO96VXp6zt89PiTztxqQ38EXNE6LcF93BBpG6WjERgqP2QHy2k0ghf/+UYGPQLwits9K UxP1xI2ndd2/OR6Ggc0N62Q1Yi82qMk5AaI0CRO6B9+ZuO+3kODm0pDrZB9DYgF5FOfo pHkMGtcPGgymIXVE0QOKEl9ynJd0YYjZcAGBvuWQv6NAQ+pa3SjaASGJAP/LPsjeQd/d GcsOIJknvI6bMTn2oVFee14hhqA/ilUD4AOxftzh8q8JK0INXhuZ2gYvmG47skE8fd3C C5lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVs6DzKjtjwQk0IFDo9utywcqVOSm2F7zqsSCvVbjwer7p+dA57N+kl9UtPnqXF5NtWXE2SPNQBg5+biw== X-Received: by 10.176.3.77 with SMTP id 71mr16029507uat.0.1461588352862; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 05:45:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.36.50 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 05:45:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <67371563.20160425130324@chriswilson.tv> References: <832578165.20160425123733@chriswilson.tv> <67371563.20160425130324@chriswilson.tv> From: PA7EY Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:45:23 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -i-JZMce5qTb50_fw-V8NuaEKHM Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: 420019f4991fbaa4f653703c21f48617 Subject: Re: LF: Dirty signal Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ec79094926905314e8e26 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7845 --001a113ec79094926905314e8e26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Chris, Your signal appeared ok here, receiving your signal at a respectable -7 dB. I saw your question too late to make a screenshot of your signal, saw your WSPR and tuning signal though. Kind regards, Ulrich, PA7EY 2016-04-25 14:03 GMT+02:00 Chris Wilson : > Hello LF 'ers > > Monday, April 25, 2016 > > > > > Best regards, > Chris 2E0ILY mailto:chris@chriswilson.tv > > > > 25 April 2016 > > > > Had a report that my LF WSPR2 signal was dirty with massive side bands > > on Sunday. I had a look at my setup today found Windows had decided to > > up the audio level from WSPR to maximum into the TS-590 and scoping > > the output of the pre amp and frequency doubler before my G3YXM amp > > showed it looking very ropey indeed. > > > I reset it and did a couple of normal WSPR2 transmissions interspersed > > with using the WSPR TUNE function, whilst watching on the G3XXM and > > G4WGT LF grabbers. I am no expert whatsoever, but it doesn't look bad > > now to me. Is this an adequate test to make and to assume things are > > now OK? Thanks. > > > Screenshots are at http://www.chriswilson.tv/signals/signals.html > > > I managed to get a few more minutes on this, and now my SA is fixed > and calibrated I thought some SA screen shots would be useful. I stuck > a small rubber duck antenna in the input port and looked at my signal > in real time off my normal TX antenna whilst actually transmitting > WSPR2. Tried with 2 frequency spans. Also took photos of the > scopematch showing a good V /I balance, and the amp meter set to show > reflected power, which all but nothing. Am I clean....? :) > > http://www.chriswilson.tv/signals2/signals2.html > > > > > > --001a113ec79094926905314e8e26 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Chris,

Your signal appeared ok here,= receiving your signal at a respectable -7 dB.
I saw your questio= n too late to make a screenshot of your signal, saw your WSPR and tuning si= gnal though.

Kind regards,

Ulrich, PA7EY

2016-04-25 14:03 GMT+02:00 Chris Wilson <chris@chriswilson.tv= >:
Hello LF 'ers

Monday, April 25, 2016




Best regards,
=C2=A0Chris=C2=A0 2E0ILY=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 mailto:chris@chriswilson.tv


> 25 April 2016


> Had a report that my LF WSPR2 signal was dirty with massive side bands=
> on Sunday. I had a look at my setup today found Windows had decided to=
> up the audio level from WSPR to maximum into the TS-590 and scoping > the output of the pre amp and frequency doubler before my G3YXM amp > showed it looking very ropey indeed.

> I reset it and did a couple of normal WSPR2 transmissions interspersed=
> with using the WSPR TUNE function, whilst watching on the G3XXM and > G4WGT LF grabbers. I am no expert whatsoever, but it doesn't look = bad
> now to me. Is this an adequate test to make and to assume things are > now OK? Thanks.

> Screenshots are at http://www.chriswilson.tv/sign= als/signals.html


I=C2=A0 managed=C2=A0 to=C2=A0 get a few more minutes on this, and now my S= A is fixed
and calibrated I thought some SA screen shots would be useful. I stuck
a=C2=A0 small=C2=A0 rubber duck antenna in the input port and looked at my = signal
in=C2=A0 real=C2=A0 time=C2=A0 off=C2=A0 my normal TX antenna whilst actual= ly transmitting
WSPR2.=C2=A0 Tried=C2=A0 with=C2=A0 2=C2=A0 frequency=C2=A0 spans.=C2=A0 Al= so=C2=A0 took=C2=A0 photos=C2=A0 of=C2=A0 the
scopematch=C2=A0 showing a good V /I balance, and the amp meter set to show=
reflected power, which all but nothing. Am I clean....? :)

http://www.chriswilson.tv/signals2/signals2.html=






--001a113ec79094926905314e8e26--