Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u3SJ2X3Z001888 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:02:35 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1avr8U-0005bg-Ga for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:58:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1avr8U-0005bX-2C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:58:02 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1avr8S-0000de-GD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:58:00 +0100 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD47209B2 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:57:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3qwmLH1bbWz5vN3 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:57:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <57225D37.9090308@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:57:59 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1545cc43544-7b51-40b@webprd-a09.mail.aol.com> <57222E30.1080202@posteo.de> <57225653.3090907@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <57225653.3090907@abelian.org> X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmission on 8270.1 Hz again - 73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7899 Hi Paul, Remember i've been on 6.47 kHz some time ago ;-) Do you expect some advantages from the 50 km band? Or is it just as a challenge? It is interesting to dream about but shouldn't we try to get some more people become active first? I remember G3XIZ and his attempts. Maybe he is reading this :-) Also we could try to play with the idea of Markus, a few stations transmitting phase-synchronous, forming a 'beam' on VLF. Another thing, i would like to study the propagation on 8.27 kHz by transmitting one week without an interruption. I would like to see the terminator passing (not Schwarzenegger!) and maybe the effect of SIDs. But maybe my signal is to weak to see it in a reasonable distance or propagation path. We will see.. But sure, i also thought about the lower frequencies, now that i have my own RX station is 3.5 km distance. I could try various experiments, even if the antenna efficiency is a lot lower down there.. 73, Stefan Am 28.04.2016 20:28, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Stefan, want to try EbNaut at a lower frequency? That would > be a good challenge. 6kHz perhaps? > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >