Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u31H4YkM012925 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:04:34 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1am2R4-0007Wd-1Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:00:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1am2R3-0007WU-He for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:00:37 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1am2R1-0002xz-PC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:00:36 +0100 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D9C20951 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:00:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3qc71G2LFJz5vMK for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:00:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <56FEA930.2060406@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 19:00:32 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <9092cd.60f0cd4e.43c8096b@aol.com>,<5696B80D.2080606@posteo.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444AE069@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>,<56FE7882.3000400@posteo.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444EA3BC@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444EA3BC@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> X-Scan-Signature: c40596c1cc3306f1877076595a921c57 Subject: Re: LF: RE: CQ QRSS-60000 on VLF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040901010000040800070009" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7554 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040901010000040800070009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Rik, You are right. I will wait a bit longer. But short tests can be done from now on :-) 73, Stefan Am 01.04.2016 15:49, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > > Hi Stefan, > > "//Now/ i can continue with real transmissions :-)/" > > hmmm, shouldn't you be listening for a possible reply for at least > a couple of weeks? > > Calling CQ and not listen for a reply would be rude ... > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Van:* owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.de] > *Verzonden:* vrijdag 1 april 2016 15:32 > *Aan:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Onderwerp:* Re: LF: RE: CQ QRSS-60000 on VLF > > Rik, VLF, > > OK, you were right. The transmission is finished. Sometimes it was a > hard time to keep me disciplined to finish the local test because i > wanted to do other things :-) > Two spectrograms attached. > *I bet it is the slowest CQ call ever!?* > Although it't just a local test. A single power loss or hang-up of the > TX-PC would have messed up the message... > Two different PCs were used, both running SpecLab. The RX instance was > 10kHz-disciplined, the TX instance was 1pps-disciplined. > > Now i can continue with real transmissions :-) > > 73, Stefan > > PS: Not an 1st April choke* > * --------------040901010000040800070009 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Rik,

You are right. I will wait a bit longer. But short tests can be done from now on :-)

73, Stefan

Am 01.04.2016 15:49, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Hi Stefan,

 

"Now i can continue with real transmissions :-)"

 

hmmm, shouldn't you be listening for a possible reply for at least a couple of weeks?

Calling CQ and not listen for a reply would be rude ...

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.de]
Verzonden: vrijdag 1 april 2016 15:32
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: RE: CQ QRSS-60000 on VLF

Rik, VLF,

OK, you were right. The transmission is finished. Sometimes it was a hard time to keep me disciplined to finish the local test because i wanted to do other things :-)
Two spectrograms attached.
I bet it is the slowest CQ call ever!?
Although it't just a local test. A single power loss or hang-up of the TX-PC would have messed up the message...
Two different PCs were used, both running SpecLab. The RX instance was 10kHz-disciplined, the TX instance was 1pps-disciplined.

Now i can continue with real transmissions :-)

73, Stefan

PS: Not an 1st April choke
--------------040901010000040800070009--