Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u32A4WIa014376 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:04:32 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1amILp-0002hJ-9e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:00:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1amILo-0002hA-NL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:00:16 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1amILm-00058g-4L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:00:15 +0100 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.162.138]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7m0a-1Zr0u33DqS-00vPX7 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:00:12 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <56E02A1B.9020309@abelian.org> <56FF7EC4.8020106@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <56FF7EC4.8020106@abelian.org> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:00:10 +0200 Message-ID: <53EDAAF03A264CE2A1FED1EDD54A2032@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdGMt5SSlzotN2W0TC+XJb576Esg9AADaydg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Yc8lbDEAt+JaYAiYJWxfnRRqMcZ+XsEgHeSZQVpcimoofZF4imm +Rh2f2sbgFJtqmJS03TFwW/NUAjowvJBqb57W+63Vz/fLOyAURdiYIrh4iZLHJHfErksbMS XcVPMg4Hpa4/luVqFE3rrqBr+eezLTR397ttqda/Tz5ZiZQdUIB5iLQqX5JYXTrXFi250y3 FFh7HnJY8fuUNCh8JYTHA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:9x+mqtHVOnQ=:ueFRWzrOc9FrUg4+2FDZln 5NdNqmU56o8ORufWI7xePN5TF0nY/sKrmUQ9O/FeIUItvkK03xh6DVLU/EHp17fN9MmaQeBL+ SfM5125X/QJ3HcqKvBdlps6SIXcprQnFv4P1Nc0or4DHT8Y8rYjETbcQBblRWuDDxPMbA2QKX gbsjeP13EaE9H1DxP5dl9zRc5r9AWuRNfCI0c26ehQXUB6qeoFe4b5p7Yksy8Ar+WinUafWNQ fRiPfcgR54os3ewCfgjjhtn+3SWoySbO6+CLDJhF4BGAaTcoNedoK2ovszBtjCZ5s6coKQVdG dnLDGjxhhmoJluHzi2Tw3anbgncd2L9mq438k3Urwk0FGOo2UunAXe0ZzXbivgH22ShnmtOUc 15EnFOYhZi+6WUZK7wVs38mKil7uFrQajaDB8wJHpJ/m0L6+1YvUmKZxUAF3m2BvfnBe4vaGj UF11YODQmIUrhB2NhRz/TK3Gzh3+d7ghBL98QgEE8yWIptZZYSSOhGPuw2niMLim9gq+O6i81 6++Waax9ICnoVVHhFhq1TYNqX0d6LiQBZA0KOpVlLJyC3HWc+w23KmvNoO+P49ek99r6QM2BT yA/kpzE93SNT80ay3RJWDzI3h0bFqGflBtPdMEkHHJBtdNrY4GHHlWlZdIoc0C/0leHCzTISx tdEURorwrcm4BTdl202KtcLEUU9NJjP6gKDEJdgOylGPM8pxPWdRt1SMSOiEID2v5/S1tl6Hy tiSOeDiHuT6aPgkxeZsO9rOifJDzyS+g9dcQJckSLIW7kg4Ih+xppmB94Nf/PIvm2PRP84p7z sxvFtB5 X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: RE: LF: Another GPSDO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7565 Hi Paul, for a comparison it might be worth to take a closer look also to this one (also made in UK). http://www.jrmiller.demon.co.uk/projects/ministd/frqstd.htm 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson >Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 10:12 AM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: Another GPSDO > > >I wrote: > > > >http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/GPS-DISCiPLINED-CLOCK-GPSDO-10MHz-10M >-OUTPUT-SQUARE-WAVE-RS232-OUTPUT-GPS-NMEA-s-/252011014153 > > > >After some trials I find this GPSDO is not so good after all. > >The 10MHz output is stable at about 9999999.9991 Hz, it appears >locked by the GPS but at the wrong frequency due to some defect >in the control loop. It is apparently a known problem and >appears on all the variations of BG7TBL's GPSDO. > >Another problem is that you cannot send RS232 commands to the GPS >chip - its serial input is taken up by the on board controller. > >So I can't recommend this one. It's a pity because it's a >neat low cost unit. > >Now I'm about to buy one of these instead > > https://www.tindie.com/products/nsayer/gps-disciplined-ocxo/ > >-- >Paul Nicholson >-- >