Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u1TNkfIw007595 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:46:41 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aaXTH-0002Gi-Fw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:43:23 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aaXTG-0002GZ-VA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:43:22 +0000 Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aaXTE-0005ge-Uj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:43:21 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l83so55134007lfd.3 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:43:20 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=0BLrUrYkG7SaSc9f2ODNKv24bcCll9Dmpw6bsbqXUOw=; b=vpabYCWOzjjshK8az9ywOMY8cZvOTkvt7GSeutI0KmxxkEKa1BjUnKSBMRQDFECUmu yYVV/5RT5g2tueEIkBsmyaaTIB11vbx5NfrrBgtNH04FFmjy8/pdI+Rln28N5wAUvqaJ 85btKrJyRmeV/cCIUagbciibJ8qx6wSUQoFyKUHR6hbGER93RkuiSHDyNIeedAqgZqxN CW7141IKV1YuNT5276uzLi8vOONRzXtDOAdO7mE7FPXVf8OJ4UKYfUJ01MscgUD0r1If fQadMCHo8AhMcSKZCz5zZNKViU6iNh4p5waQp2vbhaO1fmbgYuIhvRmQ5iM1u61uyIH+ 31Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=0BLrUrYkG7SaSc9f2ODNKv24bcCll9Dmpw6bsbqXUOw=; b=dUYfQQ6+OQhlWfIk5k605qIguz0bRTYTejVN4vt6Zeb6C+7PPii4X3yQ0FszPqAxO1 3bduDitoGI/6qtRvxvErDPr7LiMZTiLCOWTm88b+4O4OIkC/I3jhpaAqimEnQ04TObFt dPGeMnu0jMYhElpr10rtToylLx+SsWIyQwat20auLx9UncSANM/y6PQ5QpC6lCCZEbI1 YwCImvt16yhQvetjVc8a/OfitLVWWBVFcR2lyf4N1SZAZ435tkzHDn40MuOz4/46Fv5l rdD8U/sYnCUAVG+9Xo5pfFz0M+h/yR0UdM+TBZXA8gmn/B1l/JZf5YI9Dbpj5GMyH9bO Acsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKKEhgCej6BFBN/syTZnKo5h3YRBlOFq+10rm57iMt/GcaDS3H7/rjtUmF26KexmjiZMe+9n7OIy6bylA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.135.8 with SMTP id j8mr6410263lfd.64.1456789399537; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:43:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.155.193 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:43:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56D4CF24.7050609@abelian.org> References: <56D08BEF.7070708@abelian.org> <8D33ED4DA8562EE-14E0-601004@webmail-vm018.sysops.aol.com> <56D0934B.1040700@abelian.org> <56D098D3.80501@abelian.org> <56D0B22B.2020107@abelian.org> <56D0B58A.80908@tiscali.co.uk> <56D0C373.1090004@abelian.org> <56D0CC55.1060400@tele2.se> <56D0D587.7080309@abelian.org> <56D1DEAF.10202@abelian.org> <56D1FD5F.3010301@abelian.org> <56D2DA6D.20209@tele2.se> <56D326F1.1000102@abelian.org> <56D33297.9080209@abelian.org> <56D37529.9070607@abelian.org> <6732A7AB5E094156B6AE3A33E58A964F@White> <56D3875A.4060405@abelian.org> <4F4F6D69C89949808409DA43533DE43D@Clemens0811> <56D4C572.5040400@abelian.org> <56D4CF24.7050609@abelian.org> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:43:19 +0100 Message-ID: From: Domenico IZ7SLZ To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Scan-Signature: 54c274b8b0f8da777e8f702c98fe24ad Subject: Re: LF: MF: EbNaut Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fc32cac10e3052cf13623 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7145 --001a113fc32cac10e3052cf13623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Paul, again congratulations becouse i got some more better decodes. Here the results by playing only with nominals time & frequency offsets: UT Eb/N0 sym Eb/N0 carr Rank 2045 NIL 2100 5.1 7.2 0 2115 -1.3 -1.14 47 2145 4.0 5.8 0 2200 NIL 2215 5.4 7.1 0 2230 2.4 3.3 0 2245 NIL 2300 NIL So, seems that fading can interrupt completly the EbNaut signal but, i'm shure that , by making some changes in the freq. offsets, it will be possible to get also the failed decodes. For further analisys, you can download my FFT's files from dropbox https://www.dropbox.com/sh/zu0k37z95ft1xfw/AAAgwsWDdfHVxTByuT8CyY_2a?dl=0 Receiving conditions: 7m vertical whip, RX JRC NRD-92M with GPS disciplinated OCXO, soundcard calibrated with 1_pps from same GPS. All the best Domenico, iz7slz On 1 March 2016 at 00:07, Paul Nicholson wrote: > > Many thanks Markus and Domenico. I'm really pleased > with that. > > I make that about 2022 km. A distance record for me! > Maybe that is the farthest EbNaut on MF so far? > > My callsign decodes with Eb/N0 = -0.4 dB determined > from the symbol errors and +1.0 dB from the carrier > strength. Still some discrepancy there. > > Data from Markus shows invariably a lower Eb/N0 (higher > BER) than suggested by the carrier S/N. The mode is > not performing as good as it should, and the difference > is expressed in the dB between the two columns > > > start car. sym. > > 23:15 10.0 3.9 > > missing out on over 6dB there. The difference is caused > by phase jitter if the carrier Eb/N0 is greater than the > BER Eb/N0. The other way round would indicate some other > nearby signal in the decoder input band. > > The question, is that jitter from my tx or is it propagation? > > The signal from EbSynth is good. I'm suspicious of the multiplier. > > I think I will have to make up another divider and divide > the signal back down to audio frequency and compare with > the reference. I have a nifty soundcard program for accurately > comparing the phase of two signals of different frequencies. > > Now for a celebratory cup of tea. The signal stays > on air until 00:00. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > > > --001a113fc32cac10e3052cf13623 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Paul,=
again congratulations becouse i got some more better decode= s.
Here the=C2=A0 results by playing only with nominals time &= frequency offsets:

UT=C2=A0=C2=A0 Eb/N0 sym=C2=A0 Eb/N0 carr= =C2=A0 Rank

2045=C2=A0 NIL
2100=C2=A0 5.1=C2=A0 7.2=C2=A0= =C2=A0 0
2115=C2=A0=C2=A0 -1.3 -1.14=C2=A0 47
2145=C2=A0 4.0=C2=A0 5.= 8=C2=A0 0
2200=C2=A0 NIL
2215 5.4=C2=A0=C2=A0 7.1=C2=A0 0
22= 30=C2=A0 2.4=C2=A0 3.3=C2=A0 0
2245 NIL
2300 NIL

<= /div>So,=C2=A0 seems that fading can interrupt completly the EbNaut signal = but, i'm shure that , by making some changes in the freq. offsets,=C2= =A0 it will be possible to get=C2=A0 also the=C2=A0 failed decodes.

=
For further analisys, you can download my FFT's=C2=A0 files from = dropbox
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/zu0k37z95ft1xfw/AAAgwsWD= dfHVxTByuT8CyY_2a?dl=3D0

Receiving conditions: 7m ver= tical whip, RX JRC NRD-92M with GPS disciplinated OCXO, soundcard calibrate= d with 1_pps from same GPS.


All the best
Domenico, iz7slz


On 1 March 2016 at 00:07, Paul Nicholson = <vlf0403@abelian.org> wrote:

Many thanks Markus and Domenico.=C2=A0 I'm really pleased
with that.

I make that about 2022 km.=C2=A0 =C2=A0A distance record for me!
Maybe that is the farthest EbNaut on MF so far?

My callsign decodes with Eb/N0 =3D -0.4 dB determined
from the symbol errors and +1.0 dB from the carrier
strength.=C2=A0 Still some discrepancy there.

Data from Markus shows invariably a lower Eb/N0 (higher
BER) than suggested by the carrier S/N.=C2=A0 The mode is
not performing as good as it should, and the difference
is expressed in the dB between the two columns

> start=C2=A0 car. sym.
> 23:15 10.0=C2=A0 3.9

missing out on over 6dB there.=C2=A0 =C2=A0The difference is caused
by phase jitter if the carrier Eb/N0 is greater than the
BER Eb/N0.=C2=A0 =C2=A0The other way round would indicate some other
nearby signal in the decoder input band.

The question, is that jitter from my tx or is it propagation?

The signal from EbSynth is good. I'm suspicious of the multiplier.

I think I will have to make up another divider and divide
the signal back down to audio frequency and compare with
the reference.=C2=A0 =C2=A0I have a nifty soundcard program for accurately<= br> comparing the phase of two signals of different frequencies.

Now for a celebratory cup of tea.=C2=A0 =C2=A0The signal stays
on air until 00:00.

--
Paul Nicholson
--



--001a113fc32cac10e3052cf13623--