Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u277wINR027379 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:58:18 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1acpyz-0005Xs-Tk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:53:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1acpyz-0005Xj-Cs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:53:37 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1acpyx-0008Fu-1A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:53:36 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 57A77128140.A5A11 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A77128140 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:53:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub1.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E53140A8 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:53:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::edaf:341f:90e:f70e]) by ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::f5f7:d8cc:bee0:28d3%26]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:53:25 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: RE: MF TA last night Thread-Index: AQHRd6iTXxYJKwRCZU+wrmupM0/EkJ9MmOKSgADjWYCAACDkL4AAAHGF Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:53:25 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444DD7B7@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <8D3450D43313D4D-1358-E77F@webmail-vd003.sysops.aol.com> <56DC29C8.3010604@posteo.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444DD4BF@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>,<56DD2595.5040506@no3m.net> In-Reply-To: <56DD2595.5040506@no3m.net> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mimectl: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V14.3.123.2 x-originating-ip: [10.112.11.15] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130 (rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Scan-Signature: 982d53dbb4bb82e9ed4f38562b2a1556 Subject: RE: LF: RE: MF TA last night Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444DD7B7ICTSSMBX1lunaku_" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7234 --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444DD7B7ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric, aha, that explains the gap. No TA copies last night. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens Eric NO3M [no3m@no3m.net] Verzonden: maandag 7 maart 2016 7:54 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: RE: MF TA last night XJM was in SSB QSO with WH2XHD :) Conditions looked good, so we gave it a = try. WPA -> AZ Went back to WSPR afterward. Thanks for the spots; 100W TPO. 73 Eric NO3M / WG2XJM On 03/06/2016 12:03 PM, Rik Strobbe wrote: There was however a 42 minute silence period between 04:52 and 05:34 UTC (n= o copies of WG2XJM on WSPRNET). Did XJM a nap or was it a WSPRNET hickup? --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444DD7B7ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Eric,

 

aha, that explains the gap.

 

No TA copies last night.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [o= wner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Eric NO3M [no3m@no3m.net]
Verzonden: maandag 7 maart 2016 7:54
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: RE: MF TA last night

XJM was in SSB QSO with WH2XHD :)  Conditions looked good, so we = gave it a try.  WPA -> AZ

Went back to WSPR afterward.  Thanks for the spots; 100W TPO.

73 Eric NO3M / WG2XJM


On 03/06/2016 12:03 PM, Rik Strobbe wrote:



There was however a 42 minute silence period between 04:52 and 05:34 UTC= (no copies of WG2XJM on WSPRNET). Did XJM a nap or was it a WSPR= NET hickup?

 


 


--_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444DD7B7ICTSSMBX1lunaku_--