Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u1TNTCfr007557 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:29:12 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aaXC0-00027f-D4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:25:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aaXBz-00027W-Vq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:25:31 +0000 Received: from omr-m005e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.5]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aaXBx-0005cf-V2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:25:30 +0000 Received: from mtaomg-aal02.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-aal02.mx.aol.com [172.27.20.208]) by omr-m005e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 41C57380009B for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:25:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-ace01b.mail.aol.com (core-ace01.mail.aol.com [172.27.23.1]) by mtaomg-aal02.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id A8DA938000081 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:25:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from 188.192.95.60 by webprd-a39.mail.aol.com (10.72.57.58) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:25:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:25:26 -0500 From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-Id: <1532f59c804-67d8-93a4@webprd-a39.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <56D4CF24.7050609@abelian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS STD X-Originating-IP: [188.192.95.60] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1456788327; bh=eMTYrxECpFhNXQT0Jgas6GMwmO6RrDDtKP3jKCTg1fg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ygVpXvYRvwmOMIloUWoloJA52KIIES7WF/JHgSrWG9Vkm+ZVsSNXMFl0kxWFQgZdd Ec3+Nr6ZZtoieMTdYvH1f0XSoX1o01KEUf+oHutr0fKjunyxsOuheyJlS7QEC4IfQ9 K41/VjJnKPt/uN7HJXggQx9AX9FcJW2UuIxj7hek= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1b14d056d4d36618a9 X-Scan-Signature: 968492e608ae81f946d7c13a3d073eeb Subject: Re: LF: MF: EbNaut Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_48011_781701264.1456788326403" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7144 ------=_Part_48011_781701264.1456788326403 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Congratulations to Paul and Domenico, this is a well deserved cup of tea!= =20 > Maybe that is the farthest EbNaut on MF so far? I think so. Actually the other day I had tried hard to decode VO1NA here, b= ut never managed to pull enough of Joe's photons out of the noise. > The question, is that jitter from my tx or is it propagation? I'm pretty sure it's propagation. The signals from Italy had similar spread= and similar day-to-day variability. LF will be much better in that respect= . > I'm suspicious of the multiplier. It can't be that bad. Even if there was some phase noise, it would hardly r= otate the phase by a cycle or more. =20 All the best, enjoy! 73, Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Paul Nicholson An: rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: Di, 1 Mrz 2016 12:08 am Betreff: Re: LF: MF: EbNaut Many thanks Markus and Domenico. I'm really pleased with that. I make that about 2022 km. A distance record for me! Maybe that is the farthest EbNaut on MF so far? My callsign decodes with Eb/N0 =3D -0.4 dB determined from the symbol errors and +1.0 dB from the carrier strength. Still some discrepancy there. Data from Markus shows invariably a lower Eb/N0 (higher BER) than suggested by the carrier S/N. The mode is not performing as good as it should, and the difference is expressed in the dB between the two columns > start car. sym. > 23:15 10.0 3.9 missing out on over 6dB there. The difference is caused by phase jitter if the carrier Eb/N0 is greater than the BER Eb/N0. The other way round would indicate some other nearby signal in the decoder input band. The question, is that jitter from my tx or is it propagation? The signal from EbSynth is good. I'm suspicious of the multiplier. I think I will have to make up another divider and divide the signal back down to audio frequency and compare with the reference. I have a nifty soundcard program for accurately comparing the phase of two signals of different frequencies. Now for a celebratory cup of tea. The signal stays on air until 00:00. -- Paul Nicholson -- ------=_Part_48011_781701264.1456788326403 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Congratulations to Paul and Domenico, this is a well des= erved cup of tea! 

> Maybe that is the farthest EbNaut on MF= so far?
I think so. Actually the other day I had tried hard to decode&n= bsp;VO1NA here, but never managed to pull enough of Joe's ph= otons out of the noise.

> The question, is that jitter from my tx= or is it propagation?
I'm pretty sure it's propagation. The signals fro= m Italy had similar spread and similar day-to-day variabilit= y. LF will be much better in that respect.

> I'm suspicious = of the multiplier.
It can't be that bad. Even if there was some phase no= ise, it would hardly rotate the phase by a cycle or more.  <= br>
All the best, enjoy!

73, Markus (DF6NM)



-----U= rspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abeli= an.org>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ver= schickt: Di, 1 Mrz 2016 12:08 am
Betreff: Re: LF: MF: EbNaut


Many thanks Markus and Domenico. I'm really pleased
with that.
I make that about 2022 km. A distance record for me!
Maybe that i= s the farthest EbNaut on MF so far?

My callsign decodes with Eb/N0 = =3D -0.4 dB determined
from the symbol errors and +1.0 dB from the carri= er
strength. Still some discrepancy there.

Data from Markus show= s invariably a lower Eb/N0 (higher
BER) than suggested by the carrier S/= N. The mode is
not performing as good as it should, and the difference<= br>is expressed in the dB between the two columns

> start car. = sym.
> 23:15 10.0 3.9

missing out on over 6dB there. The d= ifference is caused
by phase jitter if the carrier Eb/N0 is greater than= the
BER Eb/N0. The other way round would indicate some other
nearb= y signal in the decoder input band.

The question, is that jitter fro= m my tx or is it propagation?

The signal from EbSynth is good. I'm s= uspicious of the multiplier.

I think I will have to make up another = divider and divide
the signal back down to audio frequency and compare w= ith
the reference. I have a nifty soundcard program for accurately
= comparing the phase of two signals of different frequencies.

Now for= a celebratory cup of tea. The signal stays
on air until 00:00.
--
Paul Nicholson
--


------=_Part_48011_781701264.1456788326403--