Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u14FbRKZ010903 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:37:27 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aRLtE-0006T9-Ur for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:32:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aRLtE-0006T0-Jg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:32:12 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129] helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aRLsB-0003Sv-NU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:32:11 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 770771380E7.AB055 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770771380E7 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:30:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB4.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub4.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 736B440AC for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:30:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::edaf:341f:90e:f70e]) by ICTS-S-HUB4.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::c11b:83f0:c46c:c366%26]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:30:47 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: QRSS on MF Thread-Index: AQHRX1E8b8JwVeXEPEaridHJqOZzHZ8cAfVGgAABcto= Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:30:46 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444B6710@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <56B2EC76.90601@t-online.de> <7ED794CDA0004E0981B5093D342F1D18@SPYROSCENTRAL>,<56B35329.2030606@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <56B35329.2030606@posteo.de> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mimectl: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V14.3.123.2 x-originating-ip: [10.112.11.15] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.129 (rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Scan-Signature: 3f96c9ff152a6a60cc2344b4cc7e7dd2 Subject: LF: RE: QRSS on MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444B6710ICTSSMBX1lunaku_" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6676 --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444B6710ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, all, around 476.18 kHz (let's say 476.1-476.3 kHz) seems very convenient for QRS= S, for the reasons you already mentioned. I thought this was already the de facto QRSS band segment. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.de] Verzonden: donderdag 4 februari 2016 14:33 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: LF: QRSS on MF Hi MF, It is a pity that we (whatever that means) seem to be unable to find a consensus where QRSS (3...10) activity is centered. Many chances are missed in that situation. We don't need an "authority" who defines a band plan. But we would need a discussion and a consensus then. Years ago i have centered my QRSS grabber on 476.180 kHz. It does not mean that i want to define the center of activity but i wanted to run one of the first an regular (!) QRSS MF grabbers and had to make a decision. IQ2MI is almost daily active there since years. Also it is possible to watch/monitor that range when using a USB (SSB) RX on 474.2 kHz dial, so one can use it for JT9 / WSPR / QRSS. Just a thought... 73, Stefan PS: I like the word "authority" in quotation marks. It expressed the wish to live a life as free as possible and the refusal of repression. https://www.youtube.com/watc= h?v=3DYR5ApYxkU-U Am 04.02.2016 07:55, schrieb zante@otenet.gr: > Very nice copy on Ottar's LA1TN/beacon last night in QRSS-3 at 473,8 KHz > Locators KM07JS>JP33SA QRB=3D 2948 KM > > 73, Spiros > SV8CS --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444B6710ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Stefan, all,

 

around 476.18 kHz= = (let's say 476.1-47= 6.3 kHz) seems very=  convenient for= QRSS, for the = reasons you alr= eady mentioned.

I thought this was already the de facto QRSS band segment.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens<= a target=3D"_blank"> DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.de<= a target=3D"_blank">]
Verzonden<= /b>: don= derdag 4 februari 2016 14:33
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp<= /b>: LF: QRSS on MF

Hi MF,

It is a pity&nb= sp;that we (whatever = ;that means) seem to be unable to find a
consensus where QRSS (3...10) activity is centered. Many chances are 
missed in that situa= tion.

We don't need&n= bsp;an "authority&qu= ot; who defines= a band plan. But we would need
a discussion and a consensus then.

Years ago i hav= e centered my&= nbsp;QRSS grabber&nb= sp;on 476.180 kHz. It does not 
mean that i wan= t to define the center of activity<= a target=3D"_blank"> but i wan= ted to run 
one of the first&nbs= p;an regular (!)&nbs= p;QRSS MF grabb= ers and had to make a
decision. IQ2MI is&n= bsp;almost daily&nbs= p;active there = since years. Also it= is 
possible to watch/monitor=  that range when using a USB (= SSB<= /a>) RX on 474.2
kHz dial, so on= e can use it for JT9 / WSPR / QRSS.

Just a thought...

73, Stefan

PS: I like the word "authority" in quotation marks. It expressed the 
wish to live a life = as free as possible and the refusal of repression.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DYR5ApYxkU-= U



Am 04.02.2016 07:55, schrieb zante@otenet.gr:
> Very nice&= nbsp;copy on Ot= tar's LA1TN/beacon last night in QRSS= -3 at 473,8 KHz
> Locators KM07JS= = >JP33SA  QRB=3D 2948 KM
>
> 73, Spiros
> SV8CS

--_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444B6710ICTSSMBX1lunaku_--