Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u14CLLq7010424 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:21:22 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aRIpy-0004ue-13 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:16:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aRIpx-0004uR-DI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:16:37 +0000 Received: from s16315160.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.80.234] helo=mail.vigilant.es) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aRIon-0002GW-L1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:16:36 +0000 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([87.216.178.132]) by vigilant.es with MailEnable ESMTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:38 +0100 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::3cdf:95f8:c1c9:3931]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::3cdf:95f8:c1c9:3931%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:56 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: U3S on JT-9 Thread-Index: AQHRXxrGFmBfha12VESgyu/JOIxfgp8bmRWggAAH0ICAAClUoA== Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:14:55 +0000 Message-ID: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2533784A@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <56B329B9.4050701@vsas.de> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.0.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: ef570e47a9cf5159a8093427727c2c22 Subject: RE: LF: U3S on JT-9 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2533784Aservigilantvigi_" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6670 --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2533784Aservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi MF >>a Pic or Atmel for pressing left and right buttons in the correct sequenc= e could do the job within milli seconds That reminds me on a project I made in th 90's It was a CAT interpreter which tuned a non CAT transceiver using the Up/Dow= n and step size buttons Starting from a known (home) frequency at power up, this was used to tune t= he transceiver for the different microsats working at 9600bps packet those days and keep the station running= automatically Managing U3 that way can be possible. Probably not so fast as there is time= delay needed in the buttons but interesting anyway. I have to test it ! :-) Not only for JT9 QSOs but also for getting more control when running the st= ation on remote access, something that happens to me very often. Actually I can just on/off U3 73 de Luis EA5DOM ________________________________ De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blackshe= ep.org] En nombre de Vincent Stallbaum Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2016 11:37 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: Re: LF: U3S on JT-9 Hi All, a Pic or Atmel for pressing left and right buttons in the correct sequence = could do the job within milli seconds. But too mutch action for me. A special JT9 firmware would be great. A pitty= that the code isn't open source. 73 Vinny Am 04.02.2016 10:14, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fern=E1ndez: Hi Steve, Vinny I'm also using U3 as MF exciter. Thought about using it on JT9 as I have a = U3S also (JT9 only supported in U3S not U3) But, as Vinny reports, it would be a nightmare to struggle with menus to ch= ange the message :( An U3S with UART and some commands (CAT command based maybe) would be nice.= But obviously a different beast Probably the U3S Arduino shield is the way to go for such a thing 73 de Luis EA5DOM ________________________________ De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] En nombre de Vincent Sta= llbaum Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2016 8:02 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: AW: LF: U3S on JT-9 Hello Steve, I have tried to use mine for a driver during OZ0IL activity. RX was a funcu= be pro +. The generated signal is ufb. I got many decodes. But changing the messages in 10 seconds after RX decode is nearly impossibl= e because of the menue handling. Especially entering the partners callsign = takes too long. So best solution would be to use two U3S to prepare the next message on the= second one. It's worth money. vy73 de Vinny, DL6II -------- Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Steve Datum: 04.02.2016 01:27 (GMT+01:00) An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: LF: U3S on JT-9 Have any of you been using this for JT-9 QSO work on 630m, either by itself or for a driver? Steve WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves"= : http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/ --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2533784Aservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi MF
 
>>= a Pic or Atmel for pressing left and right buttons in the correct sequence = could do the job within milli seconds
 
That reminds me on a project I ma= de in th 90's
 
It was a CAT interpreter which tu= ned a non CAT transceiver using the Up/Down and step size buttons
Starting from a known (home) freq= uency at power up, this was used to tune the transceiver for= the different
microsats working at 9600bps pack= et those days and keep the station running automatically
&= nbsp;
Managing U3 that way can be = possible. Probably not so fast as there is time delay needed in the bu= ttons
but interesting anyway. I ha= ve to test it ! :-)  
&= nbsp;
Not only for JT9 QSOs but also fo= r getting more control when running the station on remote access, something=
that happens to me very often. Ac= tually I can just on/off U3
 
73 de Luis
EA5DOM

De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.= org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] En nombre de Vincent Stallbaum
Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2016 11:37
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: Re: LF: U3S on JT-9

Hi All,

a Pic or Atmel for pressing left and right buttons in the correct sequence = could do the job within milli seconds.

But too mutch action for me. A special JT9 firmware would be great. A pitty= that the code isn't open source. 

73
Vinny



Am 04.02.2016 10:14, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fern=E1ndez:
Hi Steve, Vinny
&= nbsp;
I'm also using U3 as MF exciter. = Thought about using it on JT9 as I have a U3S also (JT9 only supp= orted in U3S not U3)
But, as Vinny reports, it would b= e a nightmare to struggle with menus to change the message :(=
&= nbsp;
An U3S with UART and some command= s (CAT command based maybe) would be nice. But obviously a different beast<= /font>
Probably the U3S Arduino shi= eld is the way to go for such a thing
&= nbsp;
73 de Luis  EA5DOM

De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_gro= up@blacksheep.org] En nombre de Vincent Stallbaum
Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2016 8:02
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: AW: LF: U3S on JT-9

Hello Steve,

I have tried to use mine for a driver during OZ0IL activity. RX was a = funcube pro +.

The generated signal is ufb. I got many decodes. 

But changing the messages in 10 seconds after RX decode is nearly impo= ssible because of the menue handling. Especially entering the partners call= sign takes too long.

So best solution would be to use two U3S to prepare the next message o= n the second one. It's worth money.

vy73 de Vinny, DL6II


-------- Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Steve <VE7SL@shaw.ca>
Datum: 04.02.2016 01:27 (GMT+01:00)
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: LF: U3S on JT-9

Have any of you been using this for JT-9 QSO work on 630m, either by itself=
or for a driver?


Steve




WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook":  http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl

VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanow= aves":
http:= //ve7sl.blogspot.ca/



--_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2533784Aservigilantvigi_--