Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u1RK2hZb001441 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:02:43 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aZl0u-0001hJ-5I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:58:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aZl0t-0001hA-Pk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:58:51 +0000 Received: from omr-m017e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aZkyw-0003eU-Sa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:58:50 +0000 Received: from mtaomg-aak01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-aak01.mx.aol.com [172.27.2.227]) by omr-m017e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 9096538000A3 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:56:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-ace03d.mail.aol.com (core-ace03.mail.aol.com [172.27.23.3]) by mtaomg-aak01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 5F41638000082 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:56:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from 188.192.95.60 by webprd-a91.mail.aol.com (10.72.112.249) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:56:20 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:56:20 -0500 From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-Id: <153244d9ee1-cce-3af8@webprd-a91.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS STD X-Originating-IP: [188.192.95.60] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1456602980; bh=ESZOvUE9Z9taYXQa0acudyuNXPAvqDRdKomWa8e0wmA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LwGjxHug9+288Asxzuxwq+A24yquxrkFGuRr2e+oRnhPftatpPSD9ULqWCP3fzT9n FMer7KpBcLoKiYTmq4ZMlh8FVJxv2GaairkShJ3Xy0NnHkG0TUiftHK8Vw7zw04hC8 2fENSisQinA7q85DJt7N1FiTsJzRjMig/QDn0m30= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1b02e356d1ff641818 X-Scan-Signature: b4d3542664c8d346a7acfd7483c042d0 Subject: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19304_247951324.1456602980063" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7048 ------=_Part_19304_247951324.1456602980063 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy, if went to 137630 instead you'd be in a DCF39 gap, much clearer here.= 137370 is also good. 73, Markus -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Andy Talbot An: rsgb_lf_group ; rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 8:45 pm Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission In that case... and I also realise I did the calculations wrong and was = in the WSPR band: I'll move up to just above it. The transmission is now on 137650Hz Mind you. 200 + 25Hz is a lot of allocation at LF to call it all WSPR Andy G4JNT On 27 February 2016 at 19:31, Markus Vester wrote: Mike's sequence ended at 19:16. Although somewhat more distant and weaker, = there's also R7NT in your passband: 2016-02-27 19:18:06 R7NT 2060km 137540.999Hz 3mHz -49.3dBOp 100% 16.5d= B 2016-02-27 19:16:53 G3XDV 843km 137542.569Hz 8mHz -30.8dBOp 100% 21.2d= B 2016-02-27 18:18:06 R7NT 2060km 137540.940Hz 2mHz -41.9dBOp 100% 18.4d= B 2016-02-27 17:18:06 R7NT 2060km 137540.945Hz 4mHz -48.7dBOp 100% 16.1d= B 73, Markus=20 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Andy Talbot An: rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 8:23 pm Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission Ah, that is close.=20 Is it still on? I don't want to switch the transmission off to take a lis= ten. Andy On 27 February 2016 at 19:05, Markus Vester wrote: The WOLF might have been in conflict with Mike's strong Opera signal: 2016-02-27 19:16:54 G3XDV 843km 137542.570Hz 4mHz -32.4dBOp 52% 20.0d= B =20 73, Markus =20 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Markus Vester An: rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 7:56 pm Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission =20 ... watching. No joy yet, the first 52.8 minute round just ended with no me= aningful result. =20 73 and good luck, Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Andy Talbot An: rsgb_lf_group ; rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 5:27 pm Betreff: LF: WOLF Transmission And now for something completely different : There is a WOLF transmission going out on 137540Hz, normal speed 10B/s Only running about 30 watts of RF or roughly 10mW EIRP. I'll be leaving it running for a while - at least until the 28V PSU too war= m (it is a linear one and not terribly well heatsinked) Andy G4JNT ------=_Part_19304_247951324.1456602980063 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy, if went to 137630 instead you'd be in a DCF39 gap,= much clearer here. 137370 is also good.

73, Markus


-----= Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmai= l.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; rsgb_l= f_group <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk>
Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2= 016 8:45 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission

In that case...   &nbs= p;and I also realise I did the calculations wrong and was in the  WSPR= band:
I'll move up to just above it.

The tran= smission is now on 137650Hz

Mind you. 200 + 25Hz i= s a lot of allocation at LF  to call it all WSPR

<= div>Andy  G4JNT

On 27 February 2016 at 19:31, Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com> wrote:
Mike's sequence ended at 19:16. Alt= hough somewhat more distant and weaker, there's also R7NT in your pass= band:

2016-02-27 19:18:06 R7NT    2060km 137540.999Hz=    3mHz -49.3dBOp 100% 16.5dB
2016-02-27 19:16:53 G3XDV &= nbsp;  843km 137542.569Hz   8mHz -30.8dBOp 100% 21.2dB
20= 16-02-27 18:18:06 R7NT    2060km 137540.940Hz   2m= Hz -41.9dBOp 100% 18.4dB
2016-02-27 17:18:06 R7NT    2060= km 137540.945Hz   4mHz -48.7dBOp 100% 16.1dB

73, Markus&nb= sp;


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Andy Talbot= <andy.g4jnt@g= mail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ve= rschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 8:23 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission
=
Ah, that is close. 
Is it sti= ll on?   I don't want to switch the transmission off to take a listen.=

Andy

On 27 February 2016 at 19:05, M= arkus Vester <markusvester@aol.com> wrote:
The WOLF might have been in conflict with Mike's strong Opera signal:=
2016-02-27 19:16:54 G3XDV    843km 137542.570Hz &n= bsp; 4mHz -32.4dBOp  52% 20.0dB
 
73, Markus

 
-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 7:56 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission

 
=20
... watching. No joy yet, the firs= t 52.8 minute round just ended with no meaningful result.
=20
  =20
73 and go= od luck,
=20
Markus (D= F6NM)
=20

=20

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk>; rsgb_lf_group <= ;rsgb_lf_= group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 5:27 pm
Betreff: LF: WOLF Transmission

=20
=20
=20
And now for something completely different :
=20

=20
There is a WOLF transmission going out on 137540Hz, normal speed 10B/s=
=20
Only running about 30 watts of RF or roughly 10mW EIRP.
=20

=20
I'll be leaving it running for a while - at least until the = 28V PSU too warm (it is a linear one and not terribly well heatsinked)=
=20

=20
Andy  G4JNT
=20



------=_Part_19304_247951324.1456602980063--