Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u08LXxWF017654 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:33:59 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aHebw-0003fX-9a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:30:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aHebv-0003fO-VX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:30:15 +0000 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aHear-0006HP-RH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:30:14 +0000 Received: from AGB ([95.150.80.237]) by mwinf5d35 with ME id 3ZUp1s00557Cn6703ZUp8d; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 22:28:52 +0100 X-ME-Helo: AGB X-ME-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 22:28:52 +0100 X-ME-IP: 95.150.80.237 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <56900304.5000602@gmx.de><8D31860C8F2D3C1-15A0-2D3B2E@webmail-vd012.sysops.aol.com><5690191B.4060508@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:28:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Scan-Signature: 7c995d39cde70605aa76dd18810a4256 Subject: Re: LF: 2200m Plots of the whole Band Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0071_01D14A5B.8FEBF520" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6210 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01D14A5B.8FEBF520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # US Experimental licence Roger=20 02:25 73 WG2XRS de DL-SWL Op65 -43 dB F:9% in nr Wolfsburg=20 used the 1 hour version, that was originally developed for 136,=20 local copy of the event ...=20 -23dB s/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS W3NF =20 -20dBs/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS K3SIW =20 -9dBs/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS W1VD =20 -18dBs/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS KB4OER =20 73-G, From: Roger Lapthorn=20 Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 8:42 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: 2200m Plots of the whole Band "for the 74kHz experiments 2 years ago" What were these please? 73s Roger G3XBM On 8 January 2016 at 20:16, Hartmut Wolff wrote: Markus, thanks for your reply. Hartmut as you are fairly close to the DCF39 site, I would have = expected even stronger sidebands in your spectrograms. Were these from = your K9AY antenna pointing away from Burg? Burg is in the minimum of the antenna at 120 degrees, about 30db down. There is still a third turn on the antenna, which I added for the = 74kHz experiments 2 years ago. Then I needed more gain for a better = signal to thermal noise ratio. For 2200m the third turn is not necessary. Only the IP2 signals are = getting more worse. 73 Hartmut ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01D14A5B.8FEBF520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
#
 
US Experimental  licence Roger
 
02:25 73 WG2XRS de DL-SWL Op65 -43 dB F:9% in nr Wolfsburg
 
used the  1 hour version, that  was originally = developed =20 for  136,
 
local copy of the  event ...
 
-23dB s/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS W3NF
-20dBs/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS K3SIW
-9dBs/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS W1VD
-18dBs/n OPERA 0.073 08/12/2013 23:07 WG2XRS KB4OER
 
73-G,
 

From: Roger Lapthorn
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 8:42 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: 2200m Plots of the whole = Band

"for the 74kHz experiments 2 years ago"

What = were these=20 please?

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 8 January 2016 at 20:16, Hartmut Wolff <h-wolff@gmx.de> wrote:
Markus,

thanks for your reply.

Hartmut as you are fairly close to the DCF39 site, = I would=20 have expected even stronger sidebands in your spectrograms. Were = these from=20 your K9AY antenna pointing away from = Burg?

Burg is=20 in the minimum of the antenna at 120 degrees, about 30db = down.

There is=20 still a third turn on the antenna, which I added for the 74kHz = experiments 2=20 years ago. Then I needed more gain for a better signal to thermal = noise=20 ratio.
For 2200m the third turn is not necessary. Only the IP2 = signals are=20 getting more worse.

73
Hartmut


<= BR>
------=_NextPart_000_0071_01D14A5B.8FEBF520--