Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u0PFN547015347 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:23:05 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aNivY-00047u-Ig for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:19:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aNivY-00047l-6G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:19:36 +0000 Received: from mail-vk0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aNiui-0006A0-Di for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:19:35 +0000 Received: by mail-vk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id e185so75130776vkb.1 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 07:18:34 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WX2FOz6htQr2LTM58piPxPgfE1i8ebse44Ysgj9h53M=; b=fAaNDwIR++6zdh7CUT+frPIHRI6BfYOKwwp/h/Bj8kun+ukNmR1xzftQXztBLLtVNh oHe5xx41/J7YcinGa7n84slGe0cZ4389637RlBcE66Vj5YBh2Rj4Pq21MPWWTUUylnGv cRXtuNCFqzVvBnFVmcWiQK7QfmlOKvvR8kH+UMR2YXzRE0DJFCBU3kY0oHYAxg0WIcun Kgclc5dSNOX2TkP3iR6stHOS6XLG6oLkM0CYmF90YHDXUM80/Z9rgzeYzvnSvRfOotDw yY7gbnd5H4rOfK3FYZ0sn3BWv6EU6Q2l7GjIQV098Fa6a5GaXYd1GHvncexBuQGmiCib dlUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WX2FOz6htQr2LTM58piPxPgfE1i8ebse44Ysgj9h53M=; b=R1zUJ+iw7M0yQWtobXHE6qRHJ1oK21VwJcRKZ4Ugf+V7jHjvkGOvhXf6eXoh5Y7cc2 KcoP6IPHDJ7NqIuo3waXK7VSzEE/nesBuZX1E7KjFfr748Knh/3gfI7g27hk93QZgQOj QeT8v8t6D/V/XxeOVSIHdE3oWKj3Jy+XI2q7SlQRX9px+T5oCBfr8KtKq38lcLakA7hu eH3fknnmq1aBC2WMobJX7IcTLK0DTBWcdPGUK6H4Wdr/iwb3wgSVT+FSLmOJ9lwdR5A1 inUKtpdvb3ABNl5WnQFXX6GcHSod0+25mxdNB5jFRVU8uVDt9akVXYwgFG0WvdrYBdz2 mAIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOROyZ2GlqLgSMUBmP7IscrnrMNMSyOpytNw2HFBU4rT17Etpj+x2Zl6L2TZJ1wR9V1xRl+pcNWHorGcLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.170.196 with SMTP id t187mr10684843vke.66.1453735067195; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 07:17:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.67.3 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 07:17:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:17:47 -0600 Message-ID: From: John Langridge To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: 6bb858db23df2b82c4f5a8cb512b45b1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPRnet problems Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114325ec471d89052a2a1297 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6504 --001a114325ec471d89052a2a1297 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks Chris. WSPRnet was very functional overnitght in North America. I was able to gather my screen shots and statistics in about 10 minutes this morning compared to 4 hours yesterday. So there has been some improvements but if the past is any indication, we will see a repeat of the problems in 2 to 4 weeks without significant intervention. WSPRnet is a good system when it works and I hope its around for a long time to come. There was more beta testing last night of the alternate system and the programmer made significant progress in fixing bugs. The good news about WSPRnet working well again, at least in the short term, is that it buys the programmer of the alternate system some time to fix bugs and implement additional features, which we have all comes to enjoy on WSPRnet. This also takes some of the pressure off as long as WSPRnet continues to work. I am encouraged and very hopeful. 73 and thanks again John KB5NJD / WG2XIQ.. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Chris wrote: > Hi John and thanks for the information. Several times lately I have given > up on WSPR as I've been unable to log in to the site or my spots are not > getting there. Only yesterday I gave up again and did some OPERA instead. > The WSPR site is unfortunately necessary for the whole process to work and > be useful. Delighted to hear your news about the new development and look > forward to seeing it in operation. > Vy 73, > Chris, G4AYT. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* John Langridge > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; 600mrg@w7ekb.com > *Sent:* Sunday, January 24, 2016 4:38 PM > *Subject:* LF: WSPRnet problems > > Good morning, > > As most ops already know, the WSPRnet website has been down more than up > over the last several days. There do not appear to be any updates to the > status posted any where, at least nothing current. Its almost as if a > "take it or leave it " attitude is now the status quo. Its a free, > volunteer-driven web site that I pay nothing for, so I can't argue. > > An alternate data warehousing and rendering system and website is being > developed and tested by a father/son team but its not ready yet. Details > will be forthcoming once appropriate. as well as instructions on the new > data entry point. > > In the mean time, if you find spots in your WSPR console RX window that > are noteworthy, please be sure to post them or send me a direct email with > the details. I use this information as part of my daily 630-meter band > report. As you can imagine, the WSPRnet outage has complicated the data > gathering and reporting. > > Thanks for your assistance. 73! > > John KB5NJD / WG2XIQ.. > > > --001a114325ec471d89052a2a1297 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Chris.=C2=A0 WSPRnet was very functi= onal overnitght in North America.=C2=A0 I was able to gather my screen shot= s and statistics in about 10 minutes this morning compared to 4 hours yeste= rday.=C2=A0 So there has been some improvements but if the past is any indi= cation, we will see a repeat of the problems in 2 to 4 weeks without signif= icant intervention.=C2=A0 WSPRnet is a good system when it works and I hope= its around for a long time to come.

There was more beta testi= ng last night of the alternate system and the programmer made significant p= rogress in fixing bugs.=C2=A0 The good news about WSPRnet working well agai= n, at least in the short term, is that it buys the programmer of the altern= ate system some time to fix bugs and implement additional features, which w= e have all comes to enjoy on WSPRnet.=C2=A0 This also takes some of the pre= ssure off as long as WSPRnet continues to work.=C2=A0 I am encouraged and v= ery hopeful.

73 and thanks again

John KB5NJD / WG= 2XIQ..

O= n Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Chris <c.ashby435@btinternet.com> wrote:
Hi John and thanks for the information= . Several=20 times lately I have given up on WSPR as I've been unable to log in to t= he site=20 or my spots are not getting there. Only yesterday I gave up again and did s= ome=20 OPERA instead. The WSPR site is unfortunately necessary for the whole proce= ss to=20 work and be useful. Delighted to hear your news about the new development a= nd=20 look forward to seeing it in operation.
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT.=C2=A0
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 4:38= =20 PM
Subject: LF: WSPRnet problems

Good morning,

As most ops already know, the WSPRnet web= site=20 has been down more than up over the last several days.=C2=A0 There do not= =20 appear to be any updates to the status posted any where, at least nothing= =20 current.=C2=A0 Its almost as if a "take it or leave it " attitu= de is now the=20 status quo.=C2=A0 Its a free, volunteer-driven web site that I pay nothin= g=20 for, so I can't argue.

An alternate data warehousing and= =20 rendering system and website is being developed and tested by a father/so= n=20 team but its not ready yet.=C2=A0 Details will be forthcoming once=20 appropriate. as well as instructions on the new data entry point.=20

In the mean time, if you find spots in your WSPR console RX= =20 window that are noteworthy, please be sure to post them or send me a dire= ct=20 email with the details.=C2=A0 I use this information as part of my daily= =20 630-meter band report.=C2=A0 As you can imagine, the WSPRnet outage has= =20 complicated the data gathering and reporting.

Thanks for you= r=20 assistance.=C2=A0 73!

John KB5NJD / WG2XIQ..



--001a114325ec471d89052a2a1297--