Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u0OHn2Xx011099 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:49:02 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aNOik-0007wH-R1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:45:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aNOik-0007w8-FU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:45:02 +0000 Received: from mail-vk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aNOhf-0003FE-T0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:45:01 +0000 Received: by mail-vk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n1so63474339vkb.3 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:43:42 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=e0MeZ5FcZ//y1Lw65W8PBoU1lcvQeKjzHTbQCCYHTw8=; b=oWRZDSl9mRLvPj/ryezdS23W7J4QJHfbE2ORSchZ5Mde/RrTFhjEhnY17WLtFjtEtq BkNfBtoV/FYu+E9Okd2QE7S5JM6aiQkMoYY31ok2vR+fkhYQgIT4MhDRUz8qiNDn+Sy/ KHz+TC5p6MBg1Z5uXNqu/4nRHxgSxbWMe2qNxTOG6OEJx2H62B5iUG9oDLVPHAqkwd8M QSxSo9Ib3RaFXr49vtJAknuUvT9NGxgK/UTDVebiSAoIl3uX82G8kWoL+oLXB4svXUWj uOsBjjTwXCBP55lXCyq6bEjT/+C1cpE8/zhuqtr+qzoQ3CStDl0xIKFBErviAmdql3dh dMWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=e0MeZ5FcZ//y1Lw65W8PBoU1lcvQeKjzHTbQCCYHTw8=; b=mFVYfoXTGIsgJreOtE57pstXQQQa9RUBa+V/gA6IoIfrRUfwynjJTCIGrvsyTBwI67 pSNSufyRHTZojP7OX8G0mSsmwkTBApjyuu8impGKgmzyTwCBsmwS1D3pDUxRGJZbA+Ix JHM9Rlf+t4pvpcDPO4my1KbvM+yyqT0i2NXfztFHQyMzkJjfKvPmlGeAzLKH2lEOWetD mvTz9FM1WmK4FDQPz+ZZgxGPJA3cr31I6+4LGsJGOB4w4sFfeXmd4LUq9y5dmJEl0Lem KjHgl+8wUlsLd37AZd3qiRX9j1LU1zYZwTHtuP/OUVsdum9rO1lI60+Ieof+GD9FgEY7 foaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORQTQsSmMBOu6u/bk5CoI595dfuINMsbkw2KvY9tpP1BpP5i1UMB9UIhIlW+hoy3kMhsldm14EOkQmlpg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.3.170 with SMTP id f42mr8452483vki.36.1453657375617; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:42:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.67.3 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:42:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56A50738.9090303@posteo.de> References: <56A50738.9090303@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:42:55 -0600 Message-ID: From: John Langridge To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: b4085bc26841e34d79a2f3beb8f287b1 Subject: Re: LF: WSPRnet problems Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11428f1a7fe776052a17fb63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6488 --001a11428f1a7fe776052a17fb63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Stefan - I think Joe is as in the dark about the situation as the rest of us, but I can't confirm that. I believe someone else is the website owner. WPSR is important to what we do so fortunately we have a couple of guys that are doing a very good job putting together the alternate site. I saw a demo of the rendering of map data last night and its very fast with real time updates over a variety of persistence scales. Data queries are what they will work on next. These guys are part of our independent Part 5 group on 630-meters here in the US and are very good at what they do so I am hopeful about the end result. 73 - more info soon! John On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:17 AM, DK7FC wrote: > Hello John, > > Thanks for the update. I was wondering what is going on and why Joe > doesn't solve the problem, or some of his workers... > Hopefully there will be a suitable system soon, which manages the rising > requests and uploads. > > 73, Stefan > > > Am 24.01.2016 17:38, schrieb John Langridge: > >> Good morning, >> >> As most ops already know, the WSPRnet website has been down more than up >> over the last several days. There do not appear to be any updates to the >> status posted any where, at least nothing current. Its almost as if a >> "take it or leave it " attitude is now the status quo. Its a free, >> volunteer-driven web site that I pay nothing for, so I can't argue. >> >> An alternate data warehousing and rendering system and website is being >> developed and tested by a father/son team but its not ready yet. Details >> will be forthcoming once appropriate. as well as instructions on the new >> data entry point. >> >> In the mean time, if you find spots in your WSPR console RX window that >> are noteworthy, please be sure to post them or send me a direct email with >> the details. I use this information as part of my daily 630-meter band >> report. As you can imagine, the WSPRnet outage has complicated the data >> gathering and reporting. >> >> Thanks for your assistance. 73! >> >> John KB5NJD / WG2XIQ.. >> >> >> > --001a11428f1a7fe776052a17fb63 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan -

I think Joe is as= in the dark about the situation as the rest of us, but I can't confirm= that.=C2=A0 I believe someone else is the website owner.=C2=A0 WPSR is imp= ortant to what we do so fortunately we have a couple of guys that are doing= a very good job putting together the alternate site.=C2=A0 I saw a demo of= the rendering of map data last night and its very fast with real time upda= tes over a variety of persistence scales.=C2=A0 Data queries are what they = will work on next.=C2=A0 These guys are part of our independent Part 5 grou= p on 630-meters here in the US and are very good at what they do so I am ho= peful about the end result.

73 - more info soon!

= John

On = Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:17 AM, DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de><= /span> wrote:
Hello John,

Thanks for the update. I was wondering what is going on and why Joe doesn&#= 39;t solve the problem, or some of his workers...
Hopefully there will be a suitable system soon, which manages the rising re= quests and uploads.

73, Stefan


Am 24.01.2016 17:38, schrieb John Langridge:
Good morning,

As most ops already know, the WSPRnet website has been down more than up ov= er the last several days.=C2=A0 There do not appear to be any updates to th= e status posted any where, at least nothing current.=C2=A0 Its almost as if= a "take it or leave it " attitude is now the status quo.=C2=A0 I= ts a free, volunteer-driven web site that I pay nothing for, so I can't= argue.

An alternate data warehousing and rendering system and website is being dev= eloped and tested by a father/son team but its not ready yet.=C2=A0 Details= will be forthcoming once appropriate. as well as instructions on the new d= ata entry point.

In the mean time, if you find spots in your WSPR console RX window that are= noteworthy, please be sure to post them or send me a direct email with the= details.=C2=A0 I use this information as part of my daily 630-meter band r= eport.=C2=A0 As you can imagine, the WSPRnet outage has complicated the dat= a gathering and reporting.

Thanks for your assistance.=C2=A0 73!

John KB5NJD / WG2XIQ..




--001a11428f1a7fe776052a17fb63--