Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u0TMO5tA028072 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:24:05 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aPHPd-0006LZ-Bp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:21:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aPHPc-0006LQ-Ve for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:21:04 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <9h9mhrlaw@gmail.com>) id 1aPHOZ-0003zk-CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:21:03 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id wb13so42127926obb.1 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:19:44 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=QBGHdsIA/LvYsGYc2dOZ1C+thur9vhQdxlOZOaCQvqU=; b=MD1y3EKVgdUfcQYYM7QWP2QcIJQCVOdYVBJM4qK+7x+k8YbuKJnvYlbRxD5Xjg0eKe OTUyTAG3CwI6dQ8MvSqaKpATDWSep4johZJxBdWMnZCxNRMc845o4XfqrHJpAe90BgD5 TvhX1pKendPBv+FcIkH6trBhBlLJS2L2G/7mXmUBM3aa8V3XYAG9/1aKdDyXSv08pRrS 3ufK0/OUQu7EjDRhCY7GLI16s9Dl/w4KRPrZTKuS8m1NJFIB77bbsiKbY6vL/IiZKof4 FSwawyF9lahQFyIgTe1o77trpTay9DiaGKHptSsqYSAsFzXtkA+1ENxAi2m1MR3ZaWi7 dq5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QBGHdsIA/LvYsGYc2dOZ1C+thur9vhQdxlOZOaCQvqU=; b=T+X5EzqfrXVeCo7iYs/h54iKHm8gucredg61CiTklBz4XS+LPWWJ4iHsE/6EjkUsfa LGwo2E2IFcMcv8HLmRhqGE7bWdS0og98aJua/U/CWEIHES01cIn/tu/wDtzYlbPqZMyG yu704OVj9voMgVh2t5dw4u8ut8hCbfQBfTSGI6IuAv4Uv3ZlC85QNJbRVAbuaEHvLSu9 8zEByDdp6EUcyAjTIjylq55QQNOiVXGNGgwNhAMwCt1TV0Y2dgFkWPrYEOb5FTdgQzTs gLktzoFSeEVTtavYWRwGZMv3YJNznQ/vyYsIbyv+PrWJTr4LOrum2L4BuvJt19zEZfuv TQZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTbs59vR4SfVY8ixNxOSY3P7GST8OCUvihek/qWRaj8FTs++KpobgDqqH/sXBO52hRAxl1wHD6/gadPxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.131.147 with SMTP id om19mr8507718oeb.82.1454105937237; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:18:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.137 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:18:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:18:57 +0100 Message-ID: From: Lawrence Galea <9h9mhrlaw@gmail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: Re: LF: MF powerful Beacon in Poland? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6544 good idea On 1/29/16, Richard S wrote: > Hi, > If a chance arose for a powerful traditional MF beacon in Poland would it > be of interest, or has WSPR done away with the need for traditional > beacons? > > By powerful, it would be meant the full legal limit (1w!) into a half wave > dipole mounted high above ground level (minimum 50m, but possibly in excess > of 100m). > > Your thoughts gentlemen > > 73s > Richard SO5GB >