MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:04:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEyHg-XE_SjFb5yqgpK1R_zKN1Z1e6ixAsLFaXcfc=4JybOZqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard S <thepowerofdoubt@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: MF powerful Beacon in Poland?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e1339acd5e0052a803669
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

--047d7b2e1339acd5e0052a803669
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,
If a chance arose for a powerful traditional MF beacon in Poland would it
be of interest, or has WSPR done away with the need for traditional beacons?

By powerful, it would be meant the full legal limit (1w!) into a half wave
dipole mounted high above ground level (minimum 50m, but possibly in excess
of 100m).

Your thoughts gentlemen

73s
Richard SO5GB

--047d7b2e1339acd5e0052a803669
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Hi,<br></div>If a chance arose for a powerful tr=
aditional MF beacon in Poland would it be of interest, or has WSPR done awa=
y with the need for traditional beacons?<br><br></div><div>By powerful, it =
would be meant the full legal limit (1w!) into a half wave dipole mounted h=
igh above ground level (minimum 50m, but possibly in excess of 100m).<br><b=
r></div><div>Your thoughts gentlemen<br><br></div><div>73s<br></div><div>Ri=
chard SO5GB<br></div></div>

--047d7b2e1339acd5e0052a803669--