Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u08LoqMl017714 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:50:52 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aHes2-0003mz-UQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:46:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aHes2-0003mq-I1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:46:54 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aHeqy-0006Kt-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:46:53 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id f206so150330027wmf.0 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:45:29 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4aUiAC5mVvuhvlqCSZ2JBp8bpEUdI9/XAzUezl++Tps=; b=CupTe/sGaveYdk/ZTc/qRbtuAj3yBiLuwYhyTrsdPBtoj8tMo0Bd7HznVtPhuNyaYr pnw+1qzftdciBySECEVkfyL+/wAnHck2oNU1z4pULLLrzcuuwwduGpQXb8cDIjiQB7YV uqcDa8lNra7xQhJWFLvn2A6AxYZJhvqaOVfccMhc3sj8MfwHv1+VgB4HwGMZdHcgiRnO O8s5Sva3jC6MAfwqo5q0wRQjYX0sgjID5h+H1B5s+owfF5nyTYYTCJWU8w6uXsb8ZdIQ /zFIIZjikAt6wwZKzRB0uH8wdvLG2FPIkct5ySuPCsVEsTbpqXPXH7gV+1ZKFQg2F03b D2tQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.87.135 with SMTP id l129mr1073854wmb.9.1452289523055; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:45:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.150.6 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:45:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:45:23 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Scan-Signature: 4b5b5ebe37a4c4f430f59bc35c1947b0 Subject: LF: Linear Amp for LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1144308c2208240528d981ad X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6211 --001a1144308c2208240528d981ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Are there any proven reliably designed LF amplifier designs power amplifiers for 137 / 475? Wideband, covering both ideally Rated for at least 300 Watts output, and ideally a lot more. I saw G3YXM's low-HF design, and it looks promising for low frequency use, but he appears to have not gone that way and went for a switchmode version at LF/MF Of course, I could just redesign that, or something similar, using suitable ferrite and a bit of feedback ,but it would be nice to avoid reinventing too many wheels. Using switching MOSFETs as linear amps still doesn't feel quite right, but enough people seem have managed it now (including my own design for a low power one) that it looks a sound-enough route to follow up. The one thing that does bother me about the technique is bias compensation with temperature. It is really asking for active bias control, but in a class-B or -AB design, where bias just affects standing current, that gets more-than a bit tricky as a concept. Andy G4JNT --001a1144308c2208240528d981ad Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Are there any proven reliably designed LF amplifier design= s power amplifiers=C2=A0=C2=A0for 137 / 475? =C2=A0 Wideband, covering both= ideally =C2=A0 =C2=A0Rated for at least 300 Watts output, and ideally a lo= t more.

I saw G3YXM's low-HF design, and it looks pr= omising for low frequency use, but he appears to have not gone that way and= went for a switchmode version at LF/MF

Of course,= I could just redesign that, or something similar, using suitable ferrite a= nd a bit of feedback ,but it would be nice to avoid reinventing too many wh= eels.

Using switching MOSFETs as linear amps still= doesn't feel quite right, but enough people seem have managed it now (= including my own design for a low power one) that it looks a sound-enough r= oute to follow up. =C2=A0 =C2=A0The one thing that does bother me about the= technique is bias compensation with temperature. =C2=A0 It is really askin= g for active bias control, but in a class-B or -AB design, where bias just = affects standing current, that gets more-than a bit tricky as a concept.

Andy =C2=A0G4JNT
--001a1144308c2208240528d981ad--