To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB25317862@servigilant.vigilant.local>
 <5255CDA8464845A3B8937A641180CFA4@White> <2965301451575717@web29m.yandex.ru>
 <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB25318D11@servigilant.vigilant.local>
 <5688037E.6050803@posteo.de> <56880784.8090105@posteo.de>
 <ABB310FFCEF84A4D922E5FB9AB37D3C1@IBM7FFA209F07C>
 <56892CF0.6080102@posteo.de> <04E680673AD94D1F82ED0C52D9A5A9D6@MichaelSappPC>
From: Tobias DG3LV <DG3LV@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <56897DFF.1060601@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 21:01:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <04E680673AD94D1F82ED0C52D9A5A9D6@MichaelSappPC>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Incomplete uploads on WSPR database
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Mike !

This file is never uploaded (to the WSPR servers), so for what reason we 
should keep it small?

HNY & 73 de dg3lv Tobias

Am 03.01.2016 um 17:58 schrieb Michael Sapp:
> Stefan & All:  If you use wsprx, try limiting the size of your ALL_WSPR
> txt file. W1VD pointed this out as the file contains a record of all of
> your captures. Rename the file as ALL_WSPR_OLD and then edit the
> ALL_WSPR file to a few weeks of data. My ALL_WSPR file had grown to
> 6.5MB which is a sizeable upload. I try to keep my ALL_WSPR file to
> under 250KB.
> 73 Mike wa3tts
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* DK7FC <mailto:selberdenken@posteo.de>
>     *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>     <mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>     *Sent:* Sunday, January 03, 2016 9:15 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: Incomplete uploads on WSPR database
>
>     R Chris, thanks for the feedback.
>
>     Well that problem does exist just since a few months. Good to know
>     that it is not local.
>     Maybe it's due to the permanantly rising usage of the software /
>     increasing number of uploaded spots and requested website update?
>     See the plot "stations participating per day" at
>     http://wsprnet.org/drupal/wsprnet/stats
>     Maybe they need a new faster server hardware...
>
>     73, Stefan
>
>     Am 03.01.2016 12:55, schrieb Chris:
>>     I frequently get the same problem Stefan. The program eventually
>>     gives up trying to send the spots to the website and you get a
>>     'timed out' message in the shell. Just before Christmas it was
>>     loading up less than half the spots I was getting, so turned it
>>     off, couldn't see the point if the reports weren't being sent!!
>>     Vy 73 es HNY to All,
>>     Chris, G4AYT.
>>
>>         ----- Original Message -----
>>         *From:* DK7FC <mailto:selberdenken@posteo.de>
>>         *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>>         <mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>>         *Sent:* Saturday, January 02, 2016 5:23 PM
>>         *Subject:* LF: Incomplete uploads on WSPR database
>>
>>         Hi all,
>>
>>         For a few times i see now that my local WSPR decodes are not
>>         completely uploaded to the database. Furthermore it often
>>         takes very long (> 15 seconds) until the WSPR map or database
>>         site is loaded.
>>
>>         For example, this was uploaded from my 3 stations on 16:58 UTC:
>>
>>         2016-01-02 16:58 	 HB9ASB 	 0.475712 	 +3 	 0 	 JN36nu 	 100
>>          DK7FC/NE 	 JN49ik 	 310 	 22
>>          2016-01-02 16:58 	 DL2WB 	 0.475777 	 -15 	 0 	 JN39qh
>>          0.2 	 DK7FC/NW 	 JN49ik 	 98 	 81
>>
>>
>>         However the actual decodes were:
>>
>>         DK7FC/NW:
>>         1658 -6 5.7 0.475712 0 HB9ASB JN36 50
>>
>>         1658 6 -1.0 0.475754 0 DH5RAE JN68 17
>>
>>         1658 -15 -1.4 0.475777 0 DL2WB JN39 23
>>
>>
>>         DK7FC/NE:
>>         1658 3 6.0 0.475712 0 HB9ASB JN36 50
>>
>>         1658 8 -0.6 0.475754 0 DH5RAE JN68 17
>>
>>
>>         DK7FC:
>>         1658 -7 6.4 0.475714 0 HB9ASB JN36 50
>>
>>         1658 4 -0.2 0.475757 0 DH5RAE JN68 17
>>
>>
>>         So 2 decodes are displayed, 7 were made. What happened to the
>>         other 5? I can see in other time slots that the WSPR instance
>>         did not hang up, i.e. there are uploads for other decodes. But
>>         randamly some are lost regularly.
>>
>>
>>         Do some of you observe similar behaviour of the software? Is
>>         the problem on my side or does the database somehow have
>>         problems during the last months?
>>
>>
>>         73, Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>>