Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id tBUIWIVQ021912 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:32:19 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aELUZ-0006oM-Vy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:28:59 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aELUZ-0006oD-NY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:28:59 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aELTh-00028Q-QJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:28:58 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f206so87254169wmf.0 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:27:50 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8YjqK6OZ1yCh0Ub1Byt4Bc9oYCx1JZ9StG4nraRTevc=; b=I2KiEa66cvkKY0yWZljs8oR+5EZY+BrArd1MHyLdrerCTxqamRRndMoCEN0bO4z3QS yKsjcTQNZzVhTSF9g76lYBNpe6M70UYEO2VzQg+XVt+50AwLQLofmBK/3e/J1Apy0l5j s8tWuJlvFrjFS0l8outaBGWTcjfFpd+cdetCsIx+ekpL+cx+eL1C33iYQkTDPR6nCjM0 gArrSkJsmb9H+LxZGRvdouhLkcRrRafQf8xxTtxpUJdhv9vWBw2+oxs0KMRf6YdqHyuo VL0htDA0OlMjPmB8u+fQJmq/+5qraUj9XIvIGv1OpTK0Cz4CmOuWFnz3sQEVfhiU5bfN mKvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.144.196 with SMTP id s187mr17475713wmd.9.1451500069750; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:27:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.150.6 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:27:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:27:49 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: LF: Coherent Comms on 475kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114737880c8e30052821b28c X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6018 --001a114737880c8e30052821b28c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I may have missed it at the time, but were any coherent tests / EbNaut type experiments done on 475kHz? And if so, what was the slowest baud rate that mostly-succeeded ? Andy G4JNT --001a114737880c8e30052821b28c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I may have missed it at the time, but were any coherent te= sts / EbNaut type experiments done on 475kHz?

And if so,= what was the slowest baud rate that mostly-succeeded ?

Andy =C2=A0G4JNT

--001a114737880c8e30052821b28c--