Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id tB9LqpKu005134 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:52:51 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1a6mcb-0006sd-Pd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 21:50:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1a6mcb-0006sP-DU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 21:50:01 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1a6mbX-00076V-Ar for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 21:50:00 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id v187so5368751wmv.1 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 13:48:40 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ltI+uy+pTuD9y/VLQR/24LSRbJmeuNNto8svJ1xotq4=; b=Ng1ygu+oKjaBcIamjZPKyoCqrWEs8PGtyiKqKnMPhwpag7KtfswJqrbT5HUL3wAunL aiankMfOl6K8XhOUNBbbTkZ9KS0tQ3lDYFOwUhWrJjlNxJFYTruIC+p53bmRhkpUP/w6 accRDchSFWX7xE+CxY7U9IP2qjVCdT/TN8H9eltWICnoeVwpQ8t/VplV2x1YzexBOYVL 3Vrj+rnyUOMbC8CmYVthLs41r+vTetaIk9/R4dNATQgH+wYW6Q4Wd7AiA+4JWbdA5fWv cxP3BBzR0TQV/tNOEedtqvuNnV7AbP0ZJLPitAPJUYqrn5RLrx+Ac8jjd5bc8FVSwUq9 dcuw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.9.138 with SMTP id 132mr13817767wmj.19.1449697718458; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 13:48:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.130.139 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 13:48:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8D300E14C5681A7-9A8-131930@webmail-vm149.sysops.aol.com> References: <566898B2.8030603@virginbroadband.com.au> <8D300E14C5681A7-9A8-131930@webmail-vm149.sysops.aol.com> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 21:48:38 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: 9ca91679b330d65f05d707c2d2b164fe Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA - carrier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id tB9LqpKu005134 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5695 Also, the absolute phase of the carrier of DCF39 changes after each period of keying, so you cannot average it through the FSK periods Andy G4JNT On 9 December 2015 at 21:40, Markus Vester wrote: > Hi Edgar, > > if I remember right, the DCF39 idle carrier is not exactly on 138830 Hz but > about 0.55 Hz up. The frequency is also not very stable and there is a ~ 0.1 > Hz spread from the telegrams, so in a narrow spectrogram it may look more > like a noise band. > > All the best, > Markus (DF6NM) > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: edgar > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Mi, 9 Dez 2015 10:13 pm > Betreff: LF: VO1NA - carrier > > Results from last night. > > Data from Spectrum Lab EbNaut instance. > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/VO1NA/data%209-12-2015.zip > > rsNTP was running to correct the PC clock. > > An attempt to use a GPS unit failed, as Spectrum lab reported several > errors. > > Spectrum. > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/VO1NA/VO1NA%209-12-2015%20250%20ms.gif > > Changes were made to the Spectrum lab set-up. > > A long term average plot was added. 1440 minutes, which may be too long. > > The spectrogram was added. > > DCF39 frequency was added to check if the set-up is working. > > It appears that it is not! As no DCF39 appeared. > > Some time will be spent checking the receiving set-up is functioning > properly. > > There are issues with the internet connection and PC which need to be > resolved. > > Thank you Joe for your signal. > > Regards,Edgar > Moonah, Tasmania.