Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id tAQNUJZL026094 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:30:20 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1a25vz-0000lP-2L for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:26:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1a25vy-0000lG-R1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:26:38 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1a25uw-0001xq-CZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:26:37 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id tAQNPGCV017954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:55:16 -0330 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:55:16 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <8D2F6B4F05F1D66-14CC-11C938@webmail-vd017.sysops.aol.com> Message-ID: References: <8D2F6B4F05F1D66-14CC-11C938@webmail-vd017.sysops.aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5360 Hi Markus, Good to see that the low power bits are arriving. The clock seems to be slow by 400ms which will be simple to fix, unless something else goes wrong. An output 12.21304 dB lower in frequency is available. Sorry Markus, I have to side with Planck and Boltzmann on this one! But frequencies are funny things as you say. How can I estimate Rrad for a 100m wire at 10 m average height on 8.3 kHz? Good night to you, Paul Andy and Domenico and group. Joe On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Markus Vester wrote: > So far I got > ? > ?? 2015 Nov 26 > start? Eb/N0?time offset > ?UT????? dB??? seconds > ? > 2030???? nil > 2100???? 1.3???? 1.2?? > 2130???? 3.9???? 1.5 > 2200???? 5.4???? 1.9 > 2230???? 7.4???? 2.3 > > Not the faintest trace in any spectrogram here. > ? > > ... Prx > Ptx ? ;-)? > Paul I was just wondering whether the computer at the receive end might be eating more power than the transmitter ;-)? > ? > 73 and good night, > Markus > ? > > ? >