Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id tARIJT7f027706 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:19:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1a2NW4-0004fF-L4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:13:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1a2NW4-0004f6-7E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:13:04 +0000 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1a2NV4-00058K-GR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:13:03 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.85 #1) id 1a2NUr-0005gh-3v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:49 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:33777 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.85 #1) id 1a2NUq-0000TP-W7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:49 +0100 Received: from mx2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.12]:56663) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.85 #1) id 1a2NRh-0001JK-T5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:08:33 +0100 Received: from x5d82294c.dyn.telefonica.de ([93.130.41.76]:63359 helo=[192.168.178.27]) by mx2.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (port 587) (Exim 4.85 #1) id 1a2NRh-0001n5-LB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:08:33 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8D2F6B4F05F1D66-14CC-11C938@webmail-vd017.sysops.aol.com> <8D2F7101B57B374-1830-415C5@webmail-vd014.sysops.aol.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Wolfgang_B=c3=bcscher?= Message-ID: <56589C1C.2030406@freenet.de> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:08:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8D2F7101B57B374-1830-415C5@webmail-vd014.sysops.aol.com> X-Originated-At: 93.130.41.76!63359 X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090201040101050400090502" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5366 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090201040101050400090502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings all, Do we have a relatively stable, but not too strong 'carrier like' signal in the vincinity of 137 kHz, to get a rough estimate of the local QRM level (by comparing that signal's SNR with the same receiver bandwidth, say 1 Hz) ? I get the impression that mine, with a loop antenna (low-impedance, broadband) dangling under the roof, is far too high. I didn't manage a single decode yet, which I first blamed on a bug in SL's timestamps (written into the decimated wave file), but since there was also not a trace of Joe's signal in a high-res spectrogram, I have my doubts.. 73, Wolf DL4YHF . Am 27.11.2015 um 10:49 schrieb Markus Vester: > A few more weaker decodes occurred here around midnight, ending before > 1 UT. The spectrogram caught a short carrier around 0:20 UT (spectrum > showing on > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/EbNaut_spectrogram.png ). > 2015 Nov 26/27 > start Eb/N0 time offset > UT dB seconds > 2030 nil > 2100 1.3 1.2 > 2130 3.9 1.5 > 2200 5.4 1.9 > 2230 7.4 2.3 > 2300 8.4 2.5 > 2330 1.9 3.0 > 0000 2.2 3.4 > 0030 1.0 3.5 > 0100 nil > 0130 nil > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) --------------090201040101050400090502 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Greetings all,

Do we have a relatively stable, but not too strong 'carrier like' signal in the vincinity of 137 kHz,
to get a rough estimate of the local QRM level (by comparing that signal's SNR with the same receiver bandwidth, say 1 Hz) ?
I get the impression that mine, with a loop antenna (low-impedance, broadband) dangling under the roof, is far too high.
I didn't manage a single decode yet, which I first blamed on a bug in SL's timestamps (written into the decimated wave file), but since there was also not a trace of Joe's signal in a high-res spectrogram, I have my doubts..

73,
  Wolf DL4YHF .



Am 27.11.2015 um 10:49 schrieb Markus Vester:
A few more weaker decodes occurred here around midnight, ending before 1 UT. The spectrogram caught a short carrier around 0:20 UT (spectrum showing on https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/EbNaut_spectrogram.png ).
 
   2015 Nov 26/27
 
start  Eb/N0  time offset
 UT      dB    seconds
 
2030     nil
2100     1.3     1.2  
2130     3.9     1.5
2200     5.4     1.9
2230     7.4     2.3
2300     8.4     2.5
2330     1.9     3.0
0000     2.2     3.4
0030     1.0     3.5
0100     nil
0130     nil
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)

--------------090201040101050400090502--