Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id tA1GrWCk014609 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:53:33 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Zsvpd-0003TW-TW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 16:50:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Zsvpd-0003TN-Ic for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 16:50:13 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1Zsvoj-0006Gx-8E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 16:50:12 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AhDADOQTZWPKyNH1xeGQEBAgsBAgEBAQKCPk2BQoZbtDWGCYYTBAICgRlNAQEBAQEBBwEBAQFBP0ERAYNiAQEBAQMITi4FBQMDEQQBAS85CgwIBhMICYgjwXABAQEHAQEBAQEei3WEQYNrgRQFjVSIbwGBIag9gnQLEoFWPjSBMIROAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A2AhDADOQTZWPKyNH1xeGQEBAgsBAgEBAQKCPk2BQoZbtDWGCYYTBAICgRlNAQEBAQEBBwEBAQFBP0ERAYNiAQEBAQMITi4FBQMDEQQBAS85CgwIBhMICYgjwXABAQEHAQEBAQEei3WEQYNrgRQFjVSIbwGBIag9gnQLEoFWPjSBMIROAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,229,1444690800"; d="scan'208,217";a="562108370" Received: from host-92-31-141-172.as13285.net (HELO malcoHP) ([92.31.141.172]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 01 Nov 2015 16:49:01 +0000 Message-ID: <02BBF483415A41E68F34797D0DDA1417@malcoHP> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <1a8427.6a713177.43669029@aol.com> <5635383B.8080403@posteo.de> <56353DB4.8010007@posteo.de> <56354AA6.1020702@posteo.de> <215F3F7B3BD74CAD81A322B601746534@PCFausto> <563616A2.5010102@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <563616A2.5010102@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 16:49:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3508.1109 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3508.1109 X-Scan-Signature: 0a8bac5594b583e1d7c1e245a9e3ea16 Subject: LF: Re: FR5ZX on MF WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0059_01D114C5.35797480" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4765 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0059_01D114C5.35797480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan es Co MF propagation also good tonite. Could FR5ZX listen on the QRSS FREQ = 476.2 plus/minus. We could all TX around that freq . Not everyone has WSPR etc but MOST = can TX on QRSS say QRSS 10=20 I am now TXing on 476.2 approx=20 de mal/g3kev From: DK7FC=20 Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2015 1:41 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: FR5ZX on MF WSPR Hi Fausto, Normal CW would have been possible last night! There were 90 decodes by = FR5ZX last night. The best reports from last night are: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az=20 2015-10-31 22:30 PA0A 0.475725 -20 0 JO33de 2 FR5ZX LG78pu = 9511 135 =20 2015-10-31 23:46 DK7FC 0.475684 -12 0 JN49ik 1 FR5ZX = LG78pu 9095 137 =20 2015-11-01 00:12 DF6NM 0.475785 -20 0 JN59nj 1 FR5ZX = LG78pu 8974 139 =20 2015-10-31 23:58 DJ0ABR 0.475665 -25 0 JN68nt 0.2 FR5ZX = LG78pu 8830 140 =20 2015-10-31 23:42 DH5RAE 0.475753 -27 0 JN68qv 0.5 FR5ZX = LG78pu 8826 141 =20 2015-10-31 23:12 IZ7SLZ 0.475777 -27 0 JN80nu 0.01 FR5ZX = LG78pu 7941 143 =20 You know, a few weeks back i've tested the readability of a signal at -6 = dB and -16 dB. -6 dB was fine for a normal speed (100 Bpm) CW QSO. -16 = dB was barely audible, not fine for a QSO, maybe a call can be copied = when repeated a few times. So i think that -12 dB should be fine for a = QSO at 60 Bpm and some concentration... But it was just a short moment = within 4 hours. Not sure if someone want to call CQ for such a long time = to make a "599tu" QSO then :-) 73, Stefan PS: Could someone provide more statistical overview of last nights = results? Am 01.11.2015 12:09, schrieb Fausto Coletti:=20 Hi Stefan,=20 -14 dB !!!=20 Virtually with 10 dB extra power you would get an audible CW = signal...at 9000 Km WOW.=20 73, Fausto IK4NMF ------=_NextPart_000_0059_01D114C5.35797480 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan es Co
MF propagation also good tonite. Could FR5ZX listen on the QRSS = FREQ=20 476.2  plus/minus.
We could all TX around that freq . Not everyone has WSPR etc but = MOST can=20 TX on QRSS say QRSS 10
I am  now TXing on 476.2 approx
de mal/g3kev
 
 
From: DK7FC
Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2015 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: FR5ZX on MF WSPR
 
Hi=20 Fausto,

Normal CW would have been possible last night! There were = 90=20 decodes by FR5ZX last night. The best reports from last night = are:

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
2015-10-31 22:30 PA0A 0.475725 -20 0 JO33de 2 FR5ZX LG78pu 9511 135
2015-10-31 23:46 DK7FC 0.475684 -12 0 JN49ik 1 FR5ZX LG78pu 9095 137
2015-11-01 00:12 DF6NM 0.475785 -20 0 JN59nj 1 FR5ZX LG78pu 8974 139
2015-10-31 23:58 DJ0ABR 0.475665 -25 0 JN68nt 0.2 FR5ZX LG78pu 8830 140
2015-10-31 23:42 DH5RAE 0.475753 -27 0 JN68qv 0.5 FR5ZX LG78pu 8826 141
2015-10-31 23:12 IZ7SLZ 0.475777 -27 0 JN80nu 0.01 FR5ZX LG78pu 7941 143

You know, a few = weeks back=20 i've tested the readability of a signal at -6 dB and -16 dB. -6 dB was = fine for=20 a normal speed (100 Bpm) CW QSO. -16 dB was barely audible, not fine for = a QSO,=20 maybe a call can be copied when repeated a few times. So i think that = -12 dB=20 should be fine for a QSO at 60 Bpm and some concentration... But it was = just a=20 short moment within 4 hours. Not sure if someone want to call CQ for = such a long=20 time to make a "599tu" QSO then :-)

73, Stefan

PS: Could = someone=20 provide more statistical overview of last nights = results?



Am=20 01.11.2015 12:09, schrieb Fausto Coletti:=20
Hi Stefan,
 
-14 dB !!!
Virtually with 10 dB extra power you=20 would get an audible CW signal...at 9000 Km = WOW.=20
 
 
73, Fausto=20 = IK4NMF

------=_NextPart_000_0059_01D114C5.35797480--