Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1002; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t9HIvsS5021872 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 20:57:54 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ZnWbJ-0003MO-NN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:53:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ZnWbJ-0003MC-Dv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:53:05 +0100 Received: from rgout0506.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.227]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnWa4-0001zy-Ky for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:53:04 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.152.57.95 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: ken.h.wright@btinternet.com X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090203.562298B4.0060,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=39/50,refid=2.7.2:2015.10.5.155416:17:39.532,ip=81.152.57.95,rules=__HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_MAILER, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __IN_REP_TO, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[95.57.152.81.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from lindavideo (81.152.57.95) by rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as ken.h.wright@btinternet.com) id 56122D98017E86CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:51:27 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1445107903; bh=EyDw3FxlvvhAhv2fWAB8hGlm0DCd0DyZVjN76W6GAKI=; h=From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To; b=YMydPLnpz69G890TiIgcBnPG/zD/Rk8lJgITfUvLMYAoIJDq9Voa0Jr4fcDHKXCSh+rnoozcgPE5k5jFIJ5xzH2DUP2icxFBR2CU7j7pfr+2stQUpYrBoNaiZoLzrBlnucj3qsu+aHMQalXGDUV4z6MChSjA3ycEUBxaaS3mMM8= From: "Ken" To: References: <08B5A81DD2D14C84874DD10EEB145569@lindavideo> <4DC3B18B20A94764A9ADCC2B5453447A@Clemens0811> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:51:31 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4DC3B18B20A94764A9ADCC2B5453447A@Clemens0811> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: AdEI8jrofS1OgrXQQc+hTfBil0RwZAACHqRAAARqy0A= X-Scan-Signature: c9c533f07c530c146486ecf89a00ebb1 Subject: LF: RE: RE: TX Toroid Material Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id t9HIvsS5021872 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4447 Hi Clements. What calculation did you use? I can send you the calculations I used if you like the values have been independently checked on LT Spice 1V. 73 Ken M0KHW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Clemens Paul Sent: 17 October 2015 17:49 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: TX Toroid Material Hi Ken, I believe two of your component values are off. I calculate 201µH for the L next to the tubes,625pF for the shunt C and 1.1mH for the second L . For the 201µH L I would use iron powder (Amidon #2), for the 1.1mH #43 ferrite. Use the mini toroid calculator to find the appropiate size regarding number of turns and allowed flux with safety margin. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Ken >Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 5:41 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: LF: TX Toroid Material > >Dear All. I am having problems with the choice of material for >the output network of the 475kHz Valve TX. The network is an L >– C – L, ‘T’ network with an input impedance of 2100 ohms and >a load of 50 ohms, for this configuration the input L is >7.7mH, shunt capacitance is 117pf, and output L is 1.1mH. The >PA design using a 6146 low power or 813 high power work fine >when simulated using LT spice IV. When testing in the real >world using the 6146 there is in excess of 800v rms rf on the >network side of the anode coupling capacitor, but nothing >after the input L. I can only conclude that I using the wrong >type material for the toroids, I used the largest size >(unmarked) toroid which gave me a modest number of turns. I >have checked the Amidon tables and Iron Powder because of the >low AL values, which leaves Ferrite, which mix would you >recommend? The simulations give me output powers 90W for the >6146, and 300W for the 813. I would be grateful for any core >material advice . > > > >Ken Wright. > >M0KHW > > > >