Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t9MA2wjh008415 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:02:58 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ZpCd7-000436-RS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:57:53 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ZpCd7-00042x-IP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:57:53 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpCc3-0004El-9z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:57:52 +0100 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44832083D for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3nhPGm4ntgz5vMw for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5628B2D0.7060002@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:56:32 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B25A181@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B25A181@servigilant.vigilant.local> X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: Re: LF: EA5DOM going vertical Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050008050307010409050201" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4573 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050008050307010409050201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis, Am 22.10.2015 10:37, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > Will get the 1.5mm^2 What is available here is multi wire (litz ??) > single wire is no longer in the market, so they said. > Is it recommended also for the coil ? Yes. Some OMs say that this litz wire (not RF litz) is even better. But i didn't see an advanatge. But theoretically i understand that litz should be better because the conductivity between the single small wires will be worse than pure copper... 73, Stefan --------------050008050307010409050201 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luis,

Am 22.10.2015 10:37, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
 
Will get the 1.5mm^2 What is available here is multi wire (litz ??) single wire is no longer in the market, so they said.
Is it recommended also for the coil ?
Yes. Some OMs say that this litz wire (not RF litz) is even better. But i didn't see an advanatge.
But theoretically i understand that litz should be better because the conductivity between the single small wires will be worse than pure copper...

73, Stefan
--------------050008050307010409050201--